j2 Global Communications Inc v. Captaris Inc

Filing 293

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich re Stipulation for Protective Order 238 . See document for details. (yb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Robert A. Sacks (SBN 150146) sacksr@sullcrom.com Brian R. England (SBN 211335) englandb@sullcrom.com SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP 1888 Century Park East, Suite 2100 Los Angeles, California 90067-1725 Tel.: (310) 712-6600 Fax: (310) 712-8800 Attorneys for Plaintiffs-Counterdefendants j2 Global Communications, Inc. and Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc. Laura A. Wytsma (State Bar No. 189527) lwytsma@loeb.com LOEB & LOEB LLP 10100 Santa Monica Boulevard, Ste. 2200 Los Angeles, California 90067-4120 Telephone: (310) 282-2000 Facsimile: (310) 282-2200 Attorneys for Defendants-Counterplaintiffs Captaris, Inc. and Open Text Corporation [additional counsel on signature page] UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 15 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 16 17 18 J2 GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and ADVANCED MESSAGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC., PlaintiffsCounterdefendants, 19 20 21 22 Case No.: CV 09-4150 DDP (AJWx) AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER v. CAPTARIS, INC. and OPEN TEXT CORPORATION, DefendantsCounterclaimants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY974366.2 213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 4 The parties to this action stipulate to, and seek entry of, the following Protective Order: 1. "Confidential" information is information that, in good faith, a person 5 producing information under this Order, whether or not a party to this action (the 6 “Producing Person”), believes to contain (a) proprietary or commercially sensitive 7 information which is not publicly known and which its owner would not reveal to 8 others except in confidence; (b) personal financial information; or (c) information 9 that should otherwise be subject to confidential treatment under the Federal Rules of 10 Civil Procedure. If a Producing Person designates information as "Confidential," 11 the designated information shall be treated as Confidential unless successfully 12 challenged under ¶ 12. When producing documents, the Producing Person shall 13 mark each page containing Confidential information as "Confidential." 14 2. "Restricted Confidential" information shall be limited to information 15 that, in good faith, a party believes to contain (a) current and past (to the extent they 16 reflect on current) business planning and financial information; (b) trade secrets; (c) 17 past or current company personnel or employee information; (d) source code; and 18 (e) information concerning a party's sales or the design, structure or workings of a 19 party's products or systems which would, if it became known to other parties, harm 20 the competitive position of its owner. If a Producing Person designates information 21 as Restricted Confidential under this Order, the designated information shall be 22 treated as Restricted Confidential unless successfully challenged under ¶ 12. When 23 producing documents, the Producing Person shall mark each page containing 24 Restricted Confidential information as "Restricted Confidential." 25 26 27 3. Any Producing Person, whether or not a party to this action, may designate information as Confidential or Restricted Confidential under this Order. 4. Producing Persons that are not parties to this action, and that produce 28 2 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 documents pursuant to a subpoena or otherwise respond to discovery requests in this 2 action, are intended beneficiaries of this Order and have the right to enforce the 3 terms of this Order as necessary to, inter alia, protect the confidentiality of the 4 materials they produce. However, nothing herein shall prevent such Producing 5 Persons from seeking or negotiating different confidentiality terms than those 6 provided for herein. 5. 7 When a document is designated as Confidential or Restricted 8 Confidential, the designation includes not only the document so designated, but also 9 any information derived from that document, and any copies, excerpts, summaries, 10 or compilations thereof. 6. 11 A person receiving information under this Order (the "Receiving 12 Person") shall use Confidential or Restricted Confidential information (together, 13 Protected Information") only to conduct this litigation or any other litigation 14 involving Captaris, Inc. and/or Open Text Corp., on the one hand, and j2 Global 15 Communications, Inc. and/or Advanced Messaging Technologies, Inc., on the other 16 hand. 17 7. By receiving information under this Order, all Receiving Persons agree 18 to be subject to the jurisdiction of this Court concerning their use of Protected 19 Information. All receiving persons other than attorneys, their staff, and independent 20 companies engaged by outside litigation counsel to perform litigation support 21 service, shall sign an acknowledgment in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A, 22 indicating that they have read and understood the terms of this Order and agree to 23 submit to the jurisdiction of the Central District of California for enforcement of this 24 Order. Counsel for each party shall maintain all original acknowledgments, and will 25 produce the same to the opposing party when so ordered by the Court. 26 27 28 8. A Receiving Person may disclose Restricted Confidential information only to the following: a. outside litigation counsel retained by a party in this action or in 3 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 any other litigation involving Captaris, Inc. and/or Open Text Corp., on the one 2 hand, and j2 Global Communications, Inc. and/or Advanced Messaging 3 Technologies, Inc., on the other hand, including attorneys, their staff, and 4 independent companies engaged by outside litigation counsel to perform litigation 5 support services; b. 7 any person giving testimony in this action at deposition, trial or counsel; 8 9 independent experts or consultants retained by outside litigation c. 6 hearing witnesses, but only if the person giving testimony is the creator, author or 10 recipient of the Restricted Confidential information, provided that such persons may 11 not retain any documents containing Restricted Confidential information provided to 12 them at such deposition, trial or hearing; d. 13 14 taking or transcribing testimony in this action; and e. 15 16 17 the Court, its personnel and any court reporters involved in any other person by written agreement of the parties or by order of the Court. Any person who receives Restricted Confidential information is prohibited 18 from prosecuting, preparing or having any substantive involvement with any patent 19 application on behalf of any party to this action relating to e-mail to fax or fax to e- 20 mail services, products, systems, or methods. 21 22 9. A Receiving Person may disclose Confidential information only to the following: 23 a. Persons listed in ¶ 8; and 24 b. Any person giving testimony in this action at deposition, trial or 25 hearing witnesses, but only for purposes of reasonable, material, and relevant 26 testimony or preparation of such testimony in the litigation, provided that such 27 persons may not retain any documents containing Protected Information; and 28 c. Employees of the Receiving Person to whom disclosure is 4 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 reasonably necessary for the management, supervision, or oversight of the litigation. 10. Before a Receiving Person can share Protected Information received 3 from a Producing Person with an independent expert or consultant under the 4 Receiving Person shall provide the Producing Person (and, if the Producing Person 5 is not a party to this action, the other parties to this action) written notice of its 6 intention, which shall include the proposed expert's curriculum vitae as well as a list 7 of any previous or current relationship with any party to this action. If the 8 Producing Person objects to the disclosure, it must send a written objection, 9 including a detailed explanation of its objection, that is received within ten business 10 days after the Producing Person's receipt of the written notice. Absent a timely 11 written objection, the Receiving Person may share Protected Information with the 12 independent expert. If the Producing Person makes a timely written objection, the 13 Receiving Person shall not share Protected Information with the independent expert 14 until the objection is resolved by agreement or by the Court. If the Producing 15 Person and Receiving Person cannot resolve this dispute, they may proceed under 16 the Local Rules addressing discovery disputes, with the Producing Person bearing 17 the burden of filing a motion and establishing good cause to support its objection. A 18 party shall not seek discovery with respect to a consultant or other non-testifying 19 expert of a party who was disclosed as a result of this paragraph regarding any 20 information, opinions or documents developed, identified and/or obtained as result 21 of, or in the course of the engagement or consultation by a party, absent a Court 22 order pursuant to a motion made by the party. 23 11. If not so designated in the transcript, deposition testimony shall be 24 deemed Restricted Confidential until thirty days following the reporter's distribution 25 of the final transcript. During those thirty days, a Producing Person may designate 26 portions of the transcript under ¶ 1 or ¶ 2 by sending written designations to all 27 parties to this action. 28 12. If a Receiving Person disagrees with a designation of information under 5 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 ¶ 1 or ¶ 2, it shall provide the Producing Person written notice of its challenge. If 2 the Producing Person and Receiving Person cannot resolve this dispute, they may 3 proceed under the Local Rules addressing discovery disputes, with the Producing 4 Person bearing the burden of filing a motion and showing that the information is 5 Confidential or Restricted Confidential. If the Producing Person and Receiving 6 Person are not able to resolve the dispute, and the Producing Person does not file a 7 motion for Protective Order within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notice, the 8 information shall lose its designation of Confidential or Restricted Confidential. 9 Failure to challenge a designation immediately does not waive a Receiving Person's 10 11 ability to bring a later challenge. 13. Source code designated "Restricted Confidential" and produced in 12 electronic form shall be maintained in the sole custody and control of the Producing 13 Person and shall be maintained, respectively, at the Los Angeles office of outside 14 counsel for Captaris, Inc. and Open Text Corp. (with respect to source code 15 produced by Captaris and/or Open Text) and at the New York office of outside 16 counsel for j2 Global Communications, Inc. and Advanced Messaging 17 Technologies, Inc. (with respect to source code produced by j2 and/or AMT). The 18 parties may vary the location by mutual agreement. The source code shall be made 19 accessible to outside counsel for the Receiving Person and their independent experts 20 or consultants who are actively assisting in the litigation during normal business 21 hours upon five (5) days advance notice of the review. 22 (a) The Producing Person shall make its source code available in 23 electronic form—if it exists in such form -on a stand-alone, i.e., non- networked, 24 standard personal computer with Microsoft Windows operating system installed in 25 accordance with its standard installation processes. In the event that the source code 26 to be produced does not exist in electronic form, the Producing Person shall so 27 certify in writing and will meet and confer in good faith to make arrangements for 28 the mutually-convenient review of such code consistent with the other provisions of 6 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 this paragraph, to the extent possible. (b) The Producing Person shall provide a dedicated, stand-alone 3 printer connected to the computer used for source code review, and it shall be 4 loaded with paper bearing pre-printed production control numbering. The 5 Receiving Party's outside counsel and/or independent experts or consultants may 6 print excerpts of the Restricted Source Code that they in good faith consider to be 7 relevant to the claim or defense of any party and only to the extent necessary to 8 perform his or her responsibilities in connection with the action. No more than 500 9 pages of hard copies of source code may be printed, absent consent by the 10 Producing Person (which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld). The 11 originals of any printouts shall be provided to counsel for the Producing Person on 12 that same day. The Producing Person's counsel shall deliver copies of the printouts 13 to the Receiving Person's outside counsel within two (2) business days. The 14 printouts of source code excerpts are to be maintained at all times in a secure 15 location at the offices of outside counsel for the Receiving Person and may be 16 reviewed by experts, consultants, and outside counsel only at outside counsel's 17 offices. The printouts or any of the information contained in the hard copies shall 18 not be converted into an electronic format, without the express consent of the 19 Producing Person, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. 20 (c) The Receiving Person's outside counsel and/or independent 21 experts or consultants shall be permitted to save, to a file on the hard drive of the 22 stand-alone computer used for source code review, excerpts of the Producing 23 Person's source code for storage or future potential printing. Such file(s) shall be 24 preserved by the Producing Person until the conclusion of the Action. 25 (d) In the event that the Receiving Person's outside counsel and/or 26 independent experts or consultants requests that any source code analytical software 27 be installed on the computer to be used for source code review, the Receiving 28 Person's outside counsel shall notify the Producing Person's counsel and provide a 7 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 copy of the source code analytical software to be installed. The Producing Person 2 shall install such source code analytical software within three (3) business days of 3 the Receiving Person's request. If the Producing Person objects to the installation of 4 the requested source code analytical software requested and provided by the 5 Receiving Person, the burden shall be on the Producing Person to promptly meet 6 and confer and, if the issue cannot be resolved, to seek relief from the Court. 7 Further, if the Receiving Person's outside counsel and/or independent experts or 8 consultants desires such analytical software to be installed or configured in a 9 particular manner, counsel for the Receiving Person shall provide instructions to the 10 Producing Person and the Producing Person shall make every reasonable effort to 11 comply with the Receiving Person's request. By way of example, such source code 12 analytical software may include (but will not be limited to) text editors, such as 13 Emacs, Unix utilities, such as Grep, environments such as Visual Studio and 14 Cygwyn, and multi-file text search tools, Visual Slick Edit, Source-Navigator, 15 PowerGrep and ExamDiff Pro, or similar programs. 16 (e) All source code shall be produced for review in its native format 17 and shall be in a form that is fully searchable, if possible. In the event that the 18 native format of the source code is not searchable, the Receiving Person may elect 19 whether to initially receive the code in native form or searchable form, with the 20 Receiving Person reserving the right to subsequently request the production of 21 relevant portions of code in both native and searchable formats, which request shall 22 not be unreasonably denied. If the source code does not exist in searchable form, 23 the Producing Person shall provide a written explanation and will meet and confer in 24 good faith to reach a reasonable accommodation for the efficient review of such 25 code consistent with the other provisions of this paragraph, to the extent possible. 26 (f) No source code produced pursuant to this Paragraph 12 shall be 27 redacted, password protected, deleted, modified or otherwise concealed or withheld 28 from review by the Receiving Person's outside counsel and/or independent experts 8 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 or consultants. 2 14. If a Producing Person inadvertently fails to designate material as 3 Protected Information at the time of production, it shall notify all Receiving Persons 4 of its failure as soon as possible after discovery. The Producing Person shall 5 promptly supply all Receiving Persons with new copies of any documents bearing 6 corrected confidentiality designations. 7 15. Any discovery documents produced in this litigation may be later 8 designated as "Attorney Client Privileged" or "Attorney Work Product" promptly 9 upon discovery by the Producing Person that any such privileged or immune 10 document was produced through inadvertence, mistake, or other error, and no 11 waiver of privilege or immunity shall be deemed to have occurred. Upon such 12 designation, the Receiving Person promptly shall make best efforts to collect all 13 copies of the documents and return them to the Producing Person. 14 16. In the event that any Protected Information is used in any proceeding in 15 connection with this litigation, it shall not lose its Confidential or Restricted 16 Confidential status through such use, and the parties shall take all steps reasonably 17 required to protect its confidentiality during such use. 18 17. To the extent that any Confidential or Restricted Confidential 19 information subject to this Protective Order (or any pleading, motion, or 20 memorandum referring to them) is proposed to be filed or is filed with the Court, 21 those materials and papers, or any portion thereof which discloses Confidential or 22 Restricted Confidential information, shall be presented to the judge (by the filing 23 party) accompanied by an application to file under seal in accordance with the 24 procedures set forth in Local Rule 79-5.1 and shall be marked "CONFIDENTIAL 25 INFORMATION FILED UNDER SEAL" on the outside of the sealing envelopes; 26 such application shall be directed to the judge to whom the papers are directed. 27 Pending a ruling on the application submitted in accordance with Local Rule 79- 28 5.1, the papers or portions thereof subject to the application shall be lodged under 9 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 seal. However, only those portions of filings containing Confidential or Restricted 2 Confidential information shall be filed under seal. The filing party shall also file 3 with the Court for regular filing a redacted version of any filing submitted under 4 Local Rule 79-5.1 in which any Confidential and/or Restricted Confidential 5 information shall be redacted. 6 18. Nothing in this Order precludes any person from disclosing or using in 7 any manner its own information, or information not obtained under this Order, even 8 if the same information is also produced under this Order. 9 19. Nothing in this Order precludes any person from showing a document 10 containing Protected Information to an individual who prepared or received the 11 document, or from disclosing Protected Information to an officer, director or 12 testifying corporate designee of the Producing Person. 13 20. No information may be withheld from discovery on the ground that the 14 material to be disclosed requires protection greater than that afforded by this 15 Protective Order unless the party claiming a need for greater protection moves for 16 an order providing such special protection pursuant to Rule 26(c) and Local Rules 17 37-1 through 37-4. 18 21. The Parties acknowledge and agree that nothing in this Protective 19 Order is intended to be construed inconsistently with the rights and obligations of 20 the Parties under Local Rules 37-1 through 37-4 governing cooperation during 21 discovery, and that, in the event of any inconsistency, the procedures defined by the 22 Local Rules shall govern. If the Parties wish to file the Joint Stipulation (or portions 23 thereof) required by Local Rule 37-2 under seal, the Parties may file a separate 24 stipulation to that effect, or the moving party may tile an ex parte application 25 making the appropriate request. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the 26 stipulation or ex parte application must demonstrate good cause as to why the Joint 27 Stipulation or portions thereof should be filed under seal. 28 22. Within sixty days of the termination of all litigation between the 10 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 parties, all Protected Information shall be destroyed or returned to the Producing 2 Person, except that outside litigation counsel of record for each party may, in 3 accordance with the access restrictions of this Order, maintain in its files one copy 4 of each deposition, hearing and/or trial transcript and any exhibits thereto, each 5 document filed with or presented to the Court (which also may include copies of the 6 foregoing items), any correspondence transmitted between outside counsel for the 7 parties to this action, and any memoranda, notes or other attorney work product 8 even if it contains Protected Information. 9 So ORDERED AND SIGNED this 14th day of December, 2011. 10 11 12 13 ________________________________ HON. ANDREW J. WISTRICH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 11 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 EXHIBIT A 3 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 4 I, ________________________ (print name), declare as follows: 5 certify that I have received a copy of the Stipulated Protective Order 6 ("Order") in the matter captioned j2 Global Communications, Inc. and Advanced 7 Messaging Technologies, Inc. v. Captaris, Inc. and Open Text Corp. United States 8 District Court for the Central District of California, Case No. CV-09-4150 DDP 9 (AJWx), which governs the production and use of Protected Information in this 10 case. I have read and understand the Order. I hereby acknowledge that I am bound 11 by the Order, and I agree to abide by it. I further understand that the Protected 12 Information many only be used in strict accordance with the terms of the Order and 13 then only for the prosecution and defense of this litigation. 14 I further acknowledge that I may be held responsible for any failure on my 15 part to comply with the provisions of the Order, and I agree to subject myself to the 16 jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, 17 for the purpose of enforcing the Order. 18 19 I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 20 21 22 23 24 __________________________ (Signature) __________________________ (Print Name) 25 26 27 28 12 Loeb & Loeb A Limited Liability Partnership Including Professional Corporations NY975559.1213833-10002 [PROPOSED] AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?