Tami Nyberg v. GC Services, LP et al

Filing 136

FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge George H Wu ORDERED, that any and all claims or causes of action with Plaintiff TAMO NYBERG has asserted in this action are hereby dismissed, withprejudice. ORDERED that all costs, including attorney's fees and expenses, areto be taxed against the party incurring the same. THIS IS A FINAL JUDGMENT. 135 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pj)

Download PDF
1 CHAMBERLAIN, HRDLICKA WHITE, WILLIAMS & MARTIN 2 WILLIAM S. HELFAND. SBOT 09388250 RYAN O. CANTRELL, SBOT 24055259] 3 1200 Smith Street, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77002 4 Tel 713-658-1818/Fax 713-658-2553 SILVER & FREEDMAN 6 A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORPORATION BETH A. SCHROEDER, CSB 119504 7 LANE E. BENDER, CSB 176057 2029 Century Park East, 19th Floor 8 Los Angeles, California 90067-3005 Tel 310.282.9400 / Fax 310.282.2500 9 Attorneys for Defendant 10 GC SERVICES, L.P. 11 12 13 14 15 TAMI NYBERG, 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 FINAL JUDGMENT vs. Defendants. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 MADE JS-6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ WESTERN DIVISION CASE NO. CV 09-4399-GW (SSx) FINAL JUDGMENT Courtroom: 10 Assigned to the Honorable George H. Wu Action Filed: Trial Date: October 21, 2008 January 26, 2010 18 GC SERVICES, L.P., In light of the Agreed Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice entered 25 into and filed by the parties in this action, and the settlement agreement 26 between the parties in this action, it is; 27 28 PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT 1 ORDERED, that any and all claims or causes of action with Plaintiff 2 TAMO NYBERG has asserted in this action are hereby dismissed, with 3 prejudice. 4 ORDERED that all costs, including attorney's fees and expenses, are 5 to be taxed against the party incurring the same. 6 /// 7 8 /// 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED FINAL JUDGMENT THIS IS A FINAL JUDGMENT. SIGNED this 3rd day of May, 2010. _________________________________ HONORABLE GEORGE H. WU 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?