Charlotta Bond et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al

Filing 16

MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER Re: Remand held before Judge Gary A. Feess. Plaintiffs have failed to file an amended complaint and the Court therefore REMANDS the case to state court. Order remanding case to Los Angeles Superior Court, Los Angeles, Case number BC413844. (csi)

Download PDF
LINK: 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 09-4913 GAF (AGRx) Date February 22, 2010 Charlotta Bond et al v. Chase Home Finance, LLC et al Present: The Honorable Renee Fisher Deputy Clerk GARY ALLEN FEESS None Court Reporter / Recorder N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiff: None Attorneys Present for Defendant: None Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER RE: REMAND On November 24, 2009, Defendant Chase Home Finance LLC ("Chase") filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (Docket No. 10.) The Court granted Chase's motion with regard to Plaintiffs' one federal claim, and gave Plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint no later than January 19, 2010. (Id.) Because Plaintiffs failed to adequately plead a federal claim, the Court did not address the remaining state law causes of action. (Id.) The Court indicated that if Plaintiffs failed to file an amended complaint, then the Court would exercise its discretion under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c) and remand the remaining state law claims. (Id.) Plaintiffs have failed to file an amended complaint and the Court therefore REMANDS the case to state court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c). IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?