Securities and Exchange Commission v. Diversity Capital Investments, Inc. et al

Filing 87

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AGAINSTDEFENDANTS DIVERSITY CAPITAL BANCORP DE MEXICO LTD., STRONGS CAPITALINVESTMENTS, INC., THE OPTIMUS FUND, INC., DAMIAN MENESES, AND JOEL S. LEY, JR.,AND RELIEF DEFENDANT SOCORRO TE RLIZZI 78 by Judge Otis D Wright, II:FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D Wright, II: Commissions Motion for Final Judgment against defendants DCBM, Strongs, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley, and relief defendant Terlizzi, is hereby GRANTED. defendants DCBM, Str ongs,Optimus, Meneses, and Ley, and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined. defendants DCBM, Strongs, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley are jointly and severally liable for disgorgement of $25,566,932, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest t hereon in the amount of $85,267, for a total of $25,652,199. Defendants shall satisfy this obligation by paying $25,652,199within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment to the Clerk of this Court. Relief defendant Terlizzi is liabl e for disgorgement of $348,424, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint for which she gave no consideration and to which she has no legitimate claim, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amoun t of $1,162, for a total of $349,586. Terlizzi shall satisfy this obligation by paying $349,586 within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment to the Clerk of this Court.The Clerk shall deposit the funds into the fund. the Clerk is directed, without further order of this Court, to deduct from the income earned on the money in the Fund a fee equal to ten percent of the income earned on the Fund. Such fee shall not exceed that authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United S tates. The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Courts approval. Terlizzi shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1961.Defendants DCBM, Strongs, and Optimus shall each pay a civil penalty in the amount of $650,000, and defendants Meneses and Ley shall each pay a civil penalty of $130,000 within 14 days of entry of this final judgment. (lc)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DAVID J. VAN HAVERMAAT (Cal. Bar No. 175761) E-mail: vanhavermaatd@sec.gov LORRAINE B. ECHAVARRIA (Cal. Bar No. 191860) E-mail: echavarrial@sec.gov TERI M. MELSON (Cal. Bar No. 185209) E-mail: melsont@sec.gov Attorneys for Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission Rosalind R. Tyson, Regional Director Michele Wein Layne, Associate Regional Director John M. McCoy III, Regional Trial Counsel 5670 Wilshire Boulevard, 11th Floor Los Angeles, California 90036 Telephone: (323) 965-3998 Facsimile: (323) 965-3908 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Plaintiff, vs. DIVERSITY CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.; DIVERSITY CAPITAL BANCORP DE MEXICO LTD.; STRONG'S CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC.; THE OPTIMUS FUND, INC.; DAMIAN MENESES; EDWARD LANTZ FERGUSON, and JOEL S. LEY, JR. Defendants, and JUAN GALINDO FLORES and SOCORRO TERLIZZI, Relief Defendants. Case No. CV 09-5449 ODW (RCx) AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT OF PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND OTHER RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS DIVERSITY CAPITAL BANCORP DE MEXICO LTD., STRONG'S CAPITAL INVESTMENTS, INC., THE OPTIMUS FUND, INC., DAMIAN MENESES, AND JOEL S. LEY, JR., AND RELIEF DEFENDANT SOCORRO TERLIZZI 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") filed a Motion for Entry of Final Judgment by Default Against Defendants Diversity Capital Bancorp de Mexico Ltd. ("DCBM"), Strong's Capital Investments, Inc. ("Strong's"), The Optimus Fund, Inc. ("Optimus"), Damian Meneses ("Meneses"), and Joel S. Ley, Jr. ("Ley"), and Relief Defendant Socorro Terlizzi ("Terlizzi") ("Motion for Final Judgment"), pursuant to Rule 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court, having considered the Commission's Motion, the memorandum of points and authorities and supplemental memorandum of points and authorities filed in support of the Motion, the declarations, and all other documents filed in support of the Motion, and all other evidence and argument presented regarding the Motion, finds that: I. IT IS ORDERED that the Commission's Motion for Final Judgment against defendants DCBM, Strong's, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley, and relief defendant Terlizzi, is hereby GRANTED. II. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants DCBM, Strong's, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley, and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security: (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to state a 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (c) (c) material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person. III. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants DCBM, Strong's, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley, and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), 15 U.S.C. § 77q(a), in the offer or sale of any security by the use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or by use of the mails, directly or indirectly: (a) (b) to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud; to obtain money or property by means of any untrue statement of a material fact or any omission of a material fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which they were made, not misleading; or to engage in any transaction, practice, or course of business which operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon the purchaser. IV. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants DCBM, Strong's, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley, and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77e, by, directly or indirectly, in the absence of any applicable exemption: 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 (a) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to sell such security through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise; (b) Unless a registration statement is in effect as to a security, carrying or causing to be carried through the mails or in interstate commerce, by any means or instruments of transportation, any such security for the purpose of sale or for delivery after sale; or (c) Making use of any means or instruments of transportation or communication in interstate commerce or of the mails to offer to sell or offer to buy through the use or medium of any prospectus or otherwise any security, unless a registration statement has been filed with the Commission as to such security, or while the registration statement is the subject of a refusal order or stop order or (prior to the effective date of the registration statement) any public proceeding or examination under Section 8 of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77h. V. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants DCBM, Strong's, Optimus, Meneses, and Ley are jointly and severally liable for disgorgement of $25,566,932, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $85,267, for a total of $25,652,199. Defendants shall satisfy this obligation by paying $25,652,199 within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment to the Clerk of this Court, together with a cover letter identifying the remitter as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendants shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of such payment and letter to the Commission's counsel in this action. By making this payment, defendants 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 relinquish all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds, and no part of the funds shall be returned to any of the defendants. The Clerk shall deposit the funds into an interest bearing account with the Court Registry Investment System or any other type of interest bearing account that is utilized by the Court. These funds, together with any interest and income earned thereon (collectively, the "Fund"), shall be held in the interest bearing account until further order of the Court. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1914 and the guidelines set by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the Clerk is directed, without further order of this Court, to deduct from the income earned on the money in the Fund a fee equal to ten percent of the income earned on the Fund. Such fee shall not exceed that authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United States. The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court's approval. Defendants shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. VI. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that relief defendant Terlizzi is liable for disgorgement of $348,424, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint for which she gave no consideration and to which she has no legitimate claim, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $1,162, for a total of $349,586. Terlizzi shall satisfy this obligation by paying $349,586 within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment to the Clerk of this Court, together with a cover letter identifying her as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Terlizzi shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of such payment and letter to the Commission's counsel in this action. By making this payment, Terlizzi relinquishes all legal and equitable right, title, and interest in such funds, and no part of the funds shall be returned to her. The Clerk shall deposit the funds into the 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Fund, described above. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1914 and the guidelines set by the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, the Clerk is directed, without further order of this Court, to deduct from the income earned on the money in the Fund a fee equal to ten percent of the income earned on the Fund. Such fee shall not exceed that authorized by the Judicial Conference of the United States. The Commission may propose a plan to distribute the Fund subject to the Court's approval. Terlizzi shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. VII. IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED that defendants DCBM, Strong's, and Optimus shall each pay a civil penalty in the amount of $650,000, and defendants Meneses and Ley shall each pay a civil penalty of $130,000, pursuant to Section 20(d) of the Securities Act, 15 U.S.C. § 77t(d), and Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act, 15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3). Defendants shall make these payments within 14 days after entry of this Final Judgment by certified check, bank cashier's check, or United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The payments shall be delivered or mailed to the Office of Financial Management, Securities and Exchange Commission, Operations Center, 6432 General Green Way, Mail Stop 0-3, Alexandria, Virginia 22312, and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the remitter as a defendant in this action; setting forth the title and civil action number of this action and the name of this Court; and specifying that payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment. Defendants shall pay post-judgment interest on any delinquent amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. The Commission shall remit the funds paid pursuant to this paragraph to the United States Treasury. VIII. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Final Judgment. 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: May 26, 2010 IX. There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rules 54(b) and 55 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this Final Judgment forthwith and without further notice. __________________________________ HONORABLE OTIS D. WRIGHT II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?