Lawrence Shih et al v. City of Corona et al

Filing 53

JUDGMENT: 1. That the administrative writ of mandate applied for herein is denied; 2. That the second cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal protection, third cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal protecti on, race and ethnicity, fourth cause of action for violation of Cal Govt Code Section § 65008, fifth cause of action for declaratory relief, and sixth cause of action for injunctive relief, alleged in the first amended complaint, shall be dismissed, without prejudice, as to all defendants;3. That each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees. by Judge Otis D Wright, II, Related to: Stipulation for Judgment, 52 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

1
2
3
4
5

JS-6

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26

Case No. CV09-6001 ODW (OPx)

LAWRENCE SHIH, Individually and
as Trustee of the Lawrence Living
Trust dated January 11, 2002, CHIYU KING, BI-SHIA KING, HSINGCHIEH SHIH and BI-YU SHIH,
individually and as Trustees of the
Hsing-Chieh and Bi-Yu W. Shih
Living Trust, dated February 3, 2003,
BIH-LIEN CHUANG, YEN SAN
CHUANG, DIANNE SHIH, TAINAN WANG, HSIU-MEI WANG,
SHERMAN SHYH HUANG LEE
and MIN LING LEE Individually and
as Trustees of the Sherman Shyh
Huang Lee Family Trust dated July
19, 1984,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Petitioners/Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CITY OF CORONA, a California
)
Municipal Corporation; THE CITY
)
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
)
CORONA and DOES 1 through 50,
)
Inclusive,
)
)
)
Respondents/Defendants.
)
)
________________________________)

JUDGMENT
COURTROOM: 11
JUDGE: HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II

27

The Plaintiff’s first cause of action for issuance of an administrative writ of

28

mandate having been argued and submitted for decision, and the Court having
1

JUDGMENT

1

submitted its Statement of Decision on March 10. 2011, and the parties having

2

stipulated that the second cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal

3

protection, third cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal

4

protection, race and ethnicity, fourth cause of action for violation of Cal Gov’t Code

5

Section § 65008, fifth cause of action for declaratory relief, and sixth cause of action

6

for injunctive relief, alleged in the first amended complaint, be dismissed, without

7

prejudice, as to all defendants, that judgment be entered reflecting the dismissal

8

without prejudice, and that each party bear their own costs and attorney fees,

9

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED

10

1. That the administrative writ of mandate applied for herein is denied;

11

2. That the second cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal

12

protection, third cause of action for violation of 42 USC Section 1983 - equal

13

protection, race and ethnicity, fourth cause of action for violation of Cal Gov’t Code

14

Section § 65008, fifth cause of action for declaratory relief, and sixth cause of action

15

for injunctive relief, alleged in the first amended complaint, shall be dismissed,

16

without prejudice, as to all defendants;

17

3. That each party shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees.

18
19
20
21
22

Dated: June 6, 2011

____________________________
HON. OTIS D. WRIGHT II, JUDGE
OF THE UNITED STATES
DISTRICT COURT

23
24
25
26
27
28
2

JUDGMENT