Mr. Corneluis Anderson v. The People of the State of California et al

Filing 10

MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court finds Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Magistrate Judge Chooljian for Poor Judgment 9 appropriate for decision without oral argument. The hearing date is hereby vacated and the mat ter is hereby taken under submission. It appears that petitioner seeks to disqualify Magistrate Judge Chooljian, because he disagrees with her rulings. This is not a basis for granting a motion to disqualify a judicial officer, and the request is therefore DENIED. Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's order on 10/28/2009, petitioner may re-file a request to proceed in forma pauperis along with the requisite copy of his inmate trust account statement. Court Reporter: Not Present. (gk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 09-6149 CAS (CT) Date O November 13, 2009 CORNELIUS ANDERSON v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. Present: The Honorable CATHERINE JEANG Deputy Clerk CHRISTINA A. SNYDER Not Present Court Reporter / Recorder Not Present N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Not Present Proceedings: Attorneys Present for Defendants: (In Chambers): PETITIONER'S MOTION TO DISQUALIFY MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHOOLJIAN FOR POOR JUDGMENT (filed 09/22/09) The Court finds this motion appropriate for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. Civ. P. 78; Local Rule 7-15. The hearing date is hereby vacated and the matter is hereby taken under submission. On August 24, 2009, petitioner Cornelius Anderson filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis. On October 28, 2009, Magistrate Judge Chooljian ("the Magistrate Judge") denied without prejudice petitioner's request to proceed in forma pauperis, because his request was not accompanied by the requisite certified copy of petitioner's inmate trust account statement reflecting his account activity for the past six months. On November 9, 2009, petitioner filed the instant motion to disqualify Magistrate Judge Chooljian for poor judgment Mot. at 1. 28 U.S.C. § 144 provides in relevant part: "Whenever a party to any proceeding in a district court makes and files a timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of any adverse party, such judge shall proceed no further therein, but another judge shall be assigned to hear such proceeding." Furthermore, 28 U.S.C. § 455(a) provides in relevant part: "Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." 28 U.S.C. § 455(b) lists a number of circumstances in which a "justice, judge, or magistrate judge" shall "disqualify himself," none of which apply here. It appears that petitioner seeks to disqualify Magistrate Judge Chooljian, because he disagrees with her rulings. This is not a basis for granting a motion to disqualify a CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 09-6149 CAS (CT) Date O November 13, 2009 CORNELIUS ANDERSON v. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ET AL. judicial officer, and the request is therefore DENIED. Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge's order on October 28, 2009, petitioner may re-file a request to proceed in forma pauperis along with the requisite copy of his inmate trust account statement. IT IS SO ORDERED. 00 Initials of Preparer : CMJ 00 CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?