Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al

Filing 7

NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Google Inc. (car) (ds).

Download PDF
Performance Pricing, Inc. v. Google Inc. et al a r li i Doc. 7 11 QUINN EMANUEL UR^UHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Charles K. Verhoeven.( ax No. 170151 } ^. 2', charlesverhoeven quinnemanuel.com r, nr David A. Perlson^ar No. 209502) ^-M ,^ ^ ^ .^ 31 davidperlson@quinnemanuel.com -^ _ ^. Jennifer A. Kash (Bar Na. 203679} ^^^-^-^ ^ .^ ^r^ , ^ enniferkash^quinnemanuel.com 4 ^ c^ r_ ^? 5^ California reet , 22nd Floor q^^ ^ 5 San Francisco , California 94111 r -^^' ^ Telephone: (415) 875-6600 ^ ^`;-; 6 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 ^: ^: > ^-^-^ ,:: ^. .'^:^.i 7 Attorneys for Defendant Gpogle Inc. and 8 AOL LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 PERFORMANCE PRICING, INC., 13 14 vs. C"` 0 CASE NO.: CV49 - 6253 GAF (CTx} DYSCOVERY IYIATTER DEFENDANT GOOGLE TNC.' S NOTICE .OF INTERESTED PARTIES PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1-1 Crum.: Judge: Hrg. Date: Hrg. Time: Plaintiff, 15 GOOGLE INC. and AOL LLC, 16 Defendants. 17 i8 19 20 21 22 23 24! 25^ 26 27 28 0 [002,5 [ 3051306985!.! Dock PaRTlF.4 D&FENŠANT GOOGL[ lNC.'S NO'!'ICE nr INTFRI^.STFnets.Justia.com r . 11 The undersigned, counsel of record for Defendant Google Inc., certifies that 2! the following listed party (or parties) may have a pecuniary interest in the outcome 3^I of this case: 4 Defendant Google Inc. declares that it is a publicly traded company. It has no 5 parent corporation, and no publicly traded corporation owns more than 10% of its 6 stock. 7 These representations are made to enable the Court to evaluate possible S disqualification or recusal. 9 10 DATED: August 25 , 2009 11 12 13 14 15 Attorneys for Defendant Google Inc. 16 17 18 ^9 20 21 '. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 O1 Q02.513G513Qb985 [ .l Respectfully submitted, QUINN EMA.N^UEL URQUHAItT OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP By ^^ ^.^ (^. David A. Perlson

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?