Margarita N. Meza v. U.S. Bancorp et al

Filing 19

MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint and sua sponte dismisses them. The case is hereby REMANDED Los Angeles County Superior Court. This Order is not intended for publication or for inclusion in the databases of Westlaw or LEXIS. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court) (jp)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535 WESTERN DIVISION 411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750 SOUTHERN DIVISION District Court Executive and Clerk of Court TERRY NAFISI Date: 11/17/2009 3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450 EASTERN DIVISION Los Angeles County Superior Court Northwest District Van Nuys Courthouse East 6230 Sylmar Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91401 Re: Case Number: 2:09-cv-06515-AHM (SSx) Previously Superior Court Case No. LC086460 Case Name: Margarita N. Meza v. U.S. Bancorp et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court's ORDER OF REMAND issued on 11/16/2009 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction. , the Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: /s/ J. Lam Deputy Clerk cc: Counsel of record 213-894-79/82 G Western $ G Eastern G Southern Division Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court Date CV - 103 (09/08) By: Deputy Clerk LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?