Margarita N. Meza v. U.S. Bancorp et al
Filing
19
MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims alleged in the First Amended Complaint and sua sponte dismisses them. The case is hereby REMANDED Los Angeles County Superior Court. This Order is not intended for publication or for inclusion in the databases of Westlaw or LEXIS. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (Attachments: # 1 CV-103 Letter of Transmittal - Remand to Superior Court) (jp)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
312 North Spring Street, Room G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012 Tel: (213) 894-3535
WESTERN DIVISION
411 West Fourth Street, Suite 1053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516 (714) 338-4750
SOUTHERN DIVISION
District Court Executive and Clerk of Court
TERRY NAFISI
Date: 11/17/2009
3470 Twelfth Street, Room 134 Riverside, CA 92501 (951) 328-4450
EASTERN DIVISION
Los Angeles County Superior Court Northwest District Van Nuys Courthouse East 6230 Sylmar Ave. Van Nuys, CA 91401
Re: Case Number: 2:09-cv-06515-AHM (SSx) Previously Superior Court Case No. LC086460 Case Name: Margarita N. Meza v. U.S. Bancorp et al Dear Sir / Madam: Pursuant to this Court's ORDER OF REMAND issued on 11/16/2009 above-referenced case is hereby remanded to your jurisdiction.
, the
Attached is a certified copy of the ORDER OF REMAND and a copy of the docket sheet from this Court. Please acknowledge receipt of the above by signing the enclosed copy of this letter and returning it to our office. Thank you for your cooperation. Respectfully, Clerk, U. S. District Court By: /s/ J. Lam Deputy Clerk
cc: Counsel of record
213-894-79/82
G Western $
G Eastern
G Southern Division
Receipt is acknowledged of the documents described herein. Clerk, Superior Court Date
CV - 103 (09/08)
By:
Deputy Clerk
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL - REMAND TO SUPERIOR COURT (CIVIL)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?