Yolanda Buggs v. Dreamworks Inc. et al

Filing 94

JUDGMENT by Judge S. James Otero: Court concludes that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact to Defendants DreamWorks, Inc.,DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., DreamWorks Animation LLC and Paramount Pictures Corporation's Motion for Sum mary Judgment. The Motion by Defendants for Summary Judgment is granted on the ground that no disputed issues ofmaterial fact exist for trial on Plaintiffs only claim for copyright infringement and that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the First Amended Complaint with prejudice.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Yolanda Buggs v. Dreamworks Inc. et al

Doc. 94

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendant(s). v. Dreamworks, Inc., et al., Yolanda Buggs, Plaintiff(s), ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

JS-6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NO. CV 09-07070 SJO (ARGx)

JUDGMENT

After due consideration, the Court concludes that there was no genuine issue as to any material fact to Defendants DreamWorks, Inc.,DreamWorks Animation SKG, Inc., DreamWorks Animation LLC and Paramount Pictures Corporation's (collectively, "Defendants") Motion for Summary Judgment. /// /// /// /// /// ///

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Motion by Defendants for Summary Judgment is granted on the ground that no disputed issues of material fact exist for trial on Plaintiff's only claim for copyright infringement and that Defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants dismissing the First Amended Complaint with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: December 28, 2010.

S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2