Simonette King et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al
Filing
49
JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AFTER COURT TRIAL by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The Court having conducted a trial of this case, having reviewed the evidence submitted by the parties, and having issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, A DJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant, that the Plaintiffs take nothing, and that Defendant recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and Local Rule 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
1
2
3
4
JS 6
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
SIMONETTE KING, et al.,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
AETNA LIFE INSURANCE
)
COMPANY, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
______________________________ )
CASE NO. CV 09-9088 DSF (RCx)
JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT
AFTER COURT TRIAL
The Court having conducted a trial of this case, having reviewed the
18
evidence submitted by the parties, and having issued its Findings of Fact and
19
Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that
20
judgment be entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant, that the Plaintiffs
21
take nothing, and that Defendant recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs
22
filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 1920, and Local Rule 54.
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated:
7/7/11
____________________________
Dale S. Fischer
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?