Simonette King et al v. Aetna Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 49

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AFTER COURT TRIAL by Judge Dale S. Fischer: The Court having conducted a trial of this case, having reviewed the evidence submitted by the parties, and having issued its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, A DJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant, that the Plaintiffs take nothing, and that Defendant recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1920, and Local Rule 54. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 JS 6 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 SIMONETTE KING, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) AETNA LIFE INSURANCE ) COMPANY, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________ ) CASE NO. CV 09-9088 DSF (RCx) JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT AFTER COURT TRIAL The Court having conducted a trial of this case, having reviewed the 18 evidence submitted by the parties, and having issued its Findings of Fact and 19 Conclusions of Law, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that 20 judgment be entered against Plaintiffs and in favor of Defendant, that the Plaintiffs 21 take nothing, and that Defendant recover its costs of suit pursuant to a bill of costs 22 filed in accordance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 1920, and Local Rule 54. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 7/7/11 ____________________________ Dale S. Fischer United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?