CYBERsitter, LLC v. The People's Republic of China et al

Filing 7

PROOF OF SERVICE OF SERVICE filed by Plaintiff CYBERsitter, LLC, re EX PARTE APPLICATION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for to Effect Service of Process (and Notice of Ex Parte Application) EX PARTE APPLICATION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for to Effect Service of Process (and Notice of Ex Parte Application) 4 , Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related), Declaration (Motion related) 6 , Memorandum in Support of Motion, 5 Request for Judicial Assistance: Letters Rogatory and [Proposed] Order served on January 22, 2010. (Fayer, Gregory)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GIPSON HOFFMAN & PANCIONE A Professional Corporation GREGORY A. FAYER (State Bar No. 232303) GFayer@ghplaw.com ELLIOT B. GIPSON (State Bar No. 234020) EGipson@ghplaw.com 1901 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 1100 Los Angeles, California 90067-6002 Telephone: (310) 556-4660 Facsimile: (310) 556-8945 Attorneys for Plaintiff CYBERsitter, LLC d/b/a Solid Oak Software UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - WESTERN DIVISION CYBERsitter, LLC, a California limited CASE NO. CV10-0038 GAF (SHx) liability company, d/b/a Solid Oak Software, Plaintiff, v. The People's Republic of China, a foreign state; Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering Ltd., a Chinese corporation; Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy Ltd., a Chinese corporation; Sony Corporation, a Japanese corporation; Lenovo Group Limited, a Chinese corporation; Toshiba Corporation, a Japanese corporation; ACER Incorporated, a Taiwanese corporation; ASUSTeK Computer Inc., a Taiwanese corporation; BenQ Corporation, a Taiwanese corporation; Haier Group Corporation, a Chinese corporation; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants. PROOF OF SERVICE BY MAIL OF NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LETTERS ROGATORY TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS; AND RELATED DOCUMENTS Judge: Ctrm: Hearing Date: Hearing Time: Hon. Gary A. Feess 740 None scheduled None scheduled Discovery Cutoff: None set Pretrial Conference: None set Trial Date: None set PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LETTERS ROGATORY TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS; AND RELATED DOCUMENTS 04444\00001\122560.1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SERVICE LIST CYBERsitter, LLC v. The People's Republic of China, et al. CASE NO. CV10-0038 GAF (SHx) DEFENDANTS: People's Republic of China Ministry of Justice Department of Judicial Assistance and Foreign Affairs Division of Judicial Assistance 10, Chaoyangmen Nandajie, Chaoyang District Beijing P.C. 100020 China Beijing Dazheng Human Language Technology Academy Ltd. Wei Di Technology Building, 7th Floor No. 8, South Blvd., Zhongguan Cun Haidian District Beijing 10008-1 China Zhengzhou Jinhui Computer System Engineering Ltd. No. 68 Shi Wei Hua Road Zhengzhou Henan 45000-1 China Haier Group Corporation No. 1 Haier Road, Hi-tech Zone Qingdao Shandong 26610-1 China Lenovo Group Limited 23/F, Lincoln House, Taikoo Place 979 King's Road Quarry Bay, Hong Kong Sony Corporation 7-1, Konan, 1-chome Minato-ku Tokyo 108-0-075 Japan Toshiba Corporation 1-1, Shibaura, 1-chome Minato-ku Tokyo 105-8-001 Japan ACER Incorporated 8F, 88, Sec. 1, Hsin Tai Wu Road Hsichih Taipei, 221, Taiwan PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LETTERS ROGATORY TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS; AND RELATED DOCUMENTS 04444\00001\122560.1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ASUSTek Computer Inc. 150-Li-Te Road Peitou Taipei City, 112, Taiwan BenQ Corporation 16 Jihu Road, Neihu Taipei, 114, Taiwan PROOF OF SERVICE OF NOTICE OF EX PARTE APPLICATION AND EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR LETTERS ROGATORY TO EFFECT SERVICE OF PROCESS; AND RELATED DOCUMENTS 04444\00001\122560.1 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?