Flinoyd Brown v. Matthew Cate

Filing 52

ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Judge S. James Otero for Report and Recommendation (Issued) 47 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and denied part: (1) Claims 6f and 6g (as enumerated in the Report and Recommendation) are dismissed with prejud ice because such claims are time-barred; and (2) the Motion is otherwise denied. (rp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FLINOYD BROWN, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 v. MATTHEW CATE, 15 Respondent. 16 17 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 10-0529 SJO(JC) ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the operative First 18 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”), respondent’s Motion 19 to Dismiss the Petition (“Motion”), petitioner’s opposition thereto, and all of the 20 records herein, including the Report and Recommendation of United States 21 Magistrate Judge. The Court approves and accepts the United States Magistrate 22 Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“Report and Recommendation”). 23 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part and denied 24 part: (1) Claims 6f and 6g (as enumerated in the Report and Recommendation) are 25 dismissed with prejudice because such claims are time-barred; and (2) the Motion 26 is otherwise denied. 27 /// 28 /// 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk serve copies of this Order and 2 the Report and Recommendation on petitioner and on respondent’s counsel. 3 IT IS SO ORDERED. 4 October 28, 2012 5 DATED: _________________________ 6 7 8 9 ________________________________________ HONORABLE S. JAMES OTERO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?