Philip Fischer v. National Railroad Passenger Corp. et al

Filing 32

JUDGMENT AND NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT by Judge Gary A. Feess, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff take nothing, that the action be dismissed with prejudice on the merits as to all claims, and that Amtrak recover its costs, the amount of which shall be determined by application to the Clerk of the Court (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BATE, PETERSON, DEACON, ZINN & YOUNG LLP LINDA VAN WINKLE DEACON (State Bar No. 60133) STEPHANIE M. SAITO (State Bar No. 188778) BATE, PETERSON, DEACON, ZINN & YOUNG LLP 888 South Figueroa Street, Fifteenth Floor Los Angeles, California 90017 Telephone: (213) 362-1860 Facsimile: (213) 362-1861 ldeacon@bpdzylaw.com ssaito@bpdzylaw.com Attorneys for Defendant NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, FIFTEENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PHILIP FISCHER, an individual, Plaintiff, vs. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., a Washington D.C. corporation; DOES 1-10, business enti(ies), form(s) unknown; DOES 11-20, individual(s); and DOES 21-30, inclusive, Defendant(s). Case No. CV10-00926 GAF(Ex) [Assigned for all purposes to the Hon. Gary Allen Feess, Courtroom 740] JUDGMENT AND NOTICE OF ENTRY OF JUDGMENT Discovery Cut-Off: Motion Cut-Off: Trial Date: Complaint Filed: February 4, 2011 February 14, 2011 April 19, 2011 December 31, 2009 (Removed from Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC 429070) 1 Judgment and Notice of Entry of Judgment 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 BATE, PETERSON, DEACON, ZINN & YOUNG LLP Defend Natio Railroa Passeng Corpor dant onal ad ger ration's (co ommonly k known as "A Amtrak") Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the A M Alternative Summar e, ry Ad djudication of Issues came on re n egularly fo hearing b or before this Court on February s 14, 2011. Li inda Van Winkle Dea W acon and S Stephanie M Saito of Bate, Peterson, M. f De eacon, Zinn & Young LLP appe n g eared on behalf of A Amtrak; An Phung appeared ngie on behalf of Plaintiff Philip Fisch ("Plaint n her tiff"). c g ing apers, oral arguments of s After considering the movi and opp position pa cou unsel and all other matters pres a m sented to th Court, I IS HEREBY ORD he IT DERED AN ADJUD ND DGED tha Plaintiff take nothin that the action be dismissed with at ng, e e d pre ejudice on the merits as to all claims, and that Amtr recover its costs, the s d rak r am mount of which shall be determi ined by app plication to the Clerk of the Co o k ourt. Order const titutes Noti of Entr of ice ry PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this O Jud dgment pu ursuant to Rule 77(d) of the Fed R deral Rules of Civil P s Procedure. 10 888 SOUTH FIGUEROA STREET, FIFTEENTH FLOOR LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90017 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Da ated: Marc 4, 2011 ch THE HONO T ORABLE GARY E. FEES United Stat District Judge U tes t 2 Judgmen and Notice o Entry of Judg nt of gment

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?