Brian Charles Dubrin v. People of the State of California

Filing 112

JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed in the instant action ("2010 Petition") is granted to the extent it requests specific performance of the plea agreement term in Los Angeles County Superior Court Case No. KA-046040 ("2000 State Case") that such 2000 conviction would not qualify, or be used as a strike by virtue of Proposition 21 and this matter is remanded to the San Ber nardino County Superior Court ("SBSC") to resentence petitioner accordingly in SBSC Case No. FCH07697 within ninety (90) days of the entry of this Judgment or final decision on any appeal therefrom, plus any additional delay authorized und er State law; and (2) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed in Case No. EDCV 12-1578, which has been consolidated with the instant action, is denied and dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ADJUDGED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dml)

1
2
3
4

JS-6

5
6
7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

19

Pursuant to this Court’s Order Accepting Findings, Conclusions and

12

BRIAN C. DUBRIN,

13
14

Petitioner,
v.

15
16

DAVE DAVEY,

Respondent.
18 ______________________________

Case No. CV 10-1032 CJC(JC)
JUDGMENT

20 Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge,
21
IT IS ADJUDGED that (1) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a
22 Person in State Custody filed in the instant action (“2010 Petition”) is granted to
23 the extent it requests specific performance of the plea agreement term in Los
24 Angeles County Superior Court Case No. KA-046040 (“2000 State Case”) – that
25 such 2000 conviction would not qualify, or be used as a strike by virtue of
26 Proposition 21 – and this matter is remanded to the San Bernardino County
27 Superior Court (“SBSC”) to resentence petitioner accordingly in SBSC Case No.
28 FCH07697 within ninety (90) days of the entry of this Judgment or final decision

1 on any appeal therefrom, plus any additional delay authorized under State law; and
2 (2) the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody filed in
3 Case No. EDCV 12-1578, which has been consolidated with the instant action, is
4 denied and dismissed with prejudice.
5

IT IS SO ADJUDGED.

6
7

DATED: September 29, 2017

8
9
10
11

_______________________________________
HONORABLE CORMAC J. CARNEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2