Kristin Luck v. OTX Acquisition Corporation et al

Filing 71

ORDER by Judge Stephen V. Wilson. Pursuant to the Stipulation to Dismiss Original Complaint, Counterclaim and ThirdParty Complaint With Prejudice 70 filed concurrently herewith by and between all parties to this action, through their designated cou nsel, that the original Complaint and all claims therein, filed by Plaintiff against Defendants be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED, that the Counterclaim and all claims therein, filed by Counter claimants again st Counter defendant be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED, that the Third Party Complaint and all claims therein, filed by Third Party Plaintiffs against Third Party Defendants be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. (MD JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

Download PDF
Kristin Luck v. OTX Acquisition Corporation et al Doc. 71 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JS-6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ­ WEST DIVISION ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) OTX ACQUISITION CORPORATION, a ) Delaware Corporation, OTX ACQUISITION ) LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, ) OTX CORPORATION, a Delaware ) Corporation, AND, DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ______________________________________ ) OTX ACQUISITION LLC, a Delaware ) Corporation, OTX CORPORATION, a ) Delaware Corporation, ) ) Third Party Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) KRISTIN LUCK, an individual, ) ) ) Counterdefendant. ) ) vs. ) ) FOREFRONT CONSULTING GROUP, INC., a California Corporation, FOREFRONT ) CONSULTING GROUP, LLC, a California ) Limited Liability Company, DECIPHER, ) INC., a California Corporation, and ROES 1 ) through 5, inclusive. ) ) Third Party Defendant. KRISTIN LUCK, an individual, Case No.: 10 CV 01671 SVW (PJWx) [Assigned for trial purposes to Hon. Stephen V. Wilson and to Magistrate Patrick J. Walsh for Discovery purposes] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO DISMISS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE [Filed concurrently with Stipulation to Dismiss] [Trial Date: 11/2/2010] [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO DISMISS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE (Case No. 10 CV 01671 SVW (PJWx) -1­ Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the Stipulation filed concurrently herewith by and between all parties to this action, through their designated counsel, that the original Complaint and all claims therein, filed by Plaintiff KRISTIN LUCK against Defendants OTX ACQUISITION CORPORATION and OTX CORPORATION, and DOES 1 through 10, be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the Stipulation filed concurrently herewith by and between all parties to this action, through their respective attorneys, that the Counterclaim and all claims therein, filed by Counterclaimants OTX ACQUISITION LLC and OTX CORPORATION against Counterdefendant KRISTIN LUCK be and hereby is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to the Stipulation filed concurrently herewith by and between all parties to this action, through their respective attorneys, that the Third Party Complaint and all claims therein, filed by Third Party Plaintiffs OTX ACQUISITION LLC and OTX CORPORATION against Third Party Defendants FOREFRONT CONSULTING GROUP, INC., FOREFRONT CONSULTING GROUP, LLC and DECIPHER, INC., and ROES 1 through 5, be dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: October 7, 2010 ____________________________________ Honorable Stephen V. Wilson United States District Court Central District of California [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION TO DISMISS ORIGINAL COMPLAINT, COUNTERCLAIM AND THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE (Case No. 10 CV 01671 SVW (PJWx) -2­

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?