Irma Hernandez et al v. Target Corporation et al

Filing 30

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge A. Howard Matz GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 29 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (se)

Irma Hernandez et al v. Target Corporation et al

Doc. 30

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

EUGENE J. EGAN (State Bar No. 130108) PAUL HANNA (State Bar No. 222012) MANNING & MARDER KASS, ELLROD, RAMIREZ LLP 15th Floor at 801 Tower 801 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant TARGET CORPORATION, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) TARGET CORPORATION, a ) Minnesota Corporation and DOES 1 ) through 10, ) ) ) Defendants. ________________________________ ) CASE NO.: CV10-2249 AHM (RZx) LASC CASE NO.: BC432379 ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL

IRMA HERNANDEZ, an individual, and ADRIANA HERNANDEZ, an 11 individual,
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LA10CV02249AHM-O.wpd

Complaint Filed: 2/23/10 Trial Date: 3/1/11

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: November 18, 2010 JS-6 _____________________________________ HONORABLE A. HOWARD MATZ

-1-

[Proposed] ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18 and not a party to the within action; my business address is 801 South Figueroa Street, 15th Floor, Los Angeles, California 90017.

On November 18, 2010 I served the document described as [Proposed] ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL on the interested parties in this action by placing true copies thereof enclosed in sealed envelopes addressed as 6 follows: Eugene Rome, Esq. Rome & Associates 8 1801 Century Park East, Suite 475 Los Angeles, CA 90067 9 1999-32912 P: 310-282-0690; F: 310-282-0691 10 Attorney for Plaintiffs IRMA HERNANDEZ & ADRIANA HERNANDEZ
7 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LA10CV02249AHM-O.wpd

X "

(BY MAIL) I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Los Angeles, California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I placed such envelope with postage thereon prepaid in the United States mail at Los Angeles, California. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing. Under that practice it would be deposited with the U.S. postal service on that same day with postage thereon fully prepaid at Los Angeles, California in the ordinary course of business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit for mailing in affidavit. (BY OVERNIGHT COURIER): I placed the above-referenced document(s) in (an) envelope(s) designated by the express service carrier (UPS) for overnight delivery, addressed as indicated above. I delivered said UPS envelope to the personnel of our mail room. I am "readily familiar" with the firm's practice of collecting and processing documents intended for UPS overnight delivery. Under that practice, after the document is delivered to the firm's mail room, it is deposited that same day, with delivery fees provided for, in a box or other facility regularly maintained by the express service carrier or is delivered to an authorized courier or driver authorized by the express service carrier to receive documents, for overnight delivery. (BY FACSIMILE) I telecopied such document to the offices of the addressee at the following fax number: . (BY PERSONAL SERVICE) I delivered such envelope by hand to the offices of the addressee. (FEDERAL) I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the above is true and correct. Executed on November 18, 2010, at Los Angeles, California. _____________________________ Brenda Leonardo
-2-

"

" " X "

[Proposed] ORDER RE STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL