Edwin Golden v. G. J. Garibay et al
Filing
22
JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered dismissing with prejudice the complaint and action against defendant G.J. Garibay.IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered dismissing without prejudice the complaint and action against defendants John Marshall, J. Cutillo, P.E. Noland, S.B. Gray and J. Vosignt (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jy)
<![CDATA[
Edwin Golden v. G. J. Garibay et al
Doc. 22
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
R&Rs\10-2807.jud 9/16/10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDWIN GOLDEN, Plaintiff, vs. G.J. GARIBAY, et al., Defendants.
) Case No. CV 10-2807-AHM(RC) ) ) ) ) JUDGMENT ) ) ) ) )
IT IS ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered dismissing with prejudice the complaint and action against defendant G.J. Garibay.
IT IS FURTHER ADJUDGED that Judgment be entered dismissing without prejudice the complaint and action against defendants John Marshall, J. Cutillo, P.E. Noland, S.B. Gray and J. Vosignt.
DATED:
10/20/10 A. HOWARD MATZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
