Lauren Bachtell-Willars-Marien et al v. City of Gardena et al

Filing 60

ORDER APPROVING MINOR COMPROMISE OF A DISPUTED CLAIM by Judge A. Howard Matz, re MOTION for Settlement Approval of MINOR'S COMPROMISE 57 . IT IS ORDERED that the Court approves the compromise settlement and the proposed disposition of the proceeds for the claimant, M.V.M as being fair, reasonable, and in the best interest of the claimant, M.V.M. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (kbr)

Download PDF
ERIC V. LUEDTKE, SBN:172360 LAW OFFICES OF ERIC V. LUEDTKE 2 3230 E. Imperial Highway, Suite 208 Brea, California 92821 3 Telephone No.: (714)579-1700 Facsimile No.: (714)579-1710 1 4 BRAD A. MOKRI, SBN: 208213 JENNIFER N. HUPE, SBN: 256009 LAW OFFICES OF MOKRI & ASSOCIATES 6 1851 East First Street, Suite 900 Santa Ana, California 92705 7 Telephone No.: (714) 619-9395 Facsimile No.: (714) 619-9396 5 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiffs LAUREN BACHTELL-WILLARS-MARIEN; and minor M.V.M. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-WESTERN DIVISION 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) vs. ) ) ) CITY OF GARDENA a California ) public entity; GARDENA POLICE DEPARTMENT, a California public ) ) entity; and EDGAR VARGAS, an ) Individual, ) ) Defendants. ______________________________ LAUREN BACHTELL-WILLARSMARIEN, an individual and successor-in-interest for Mitchell 15 Marien; and M.V.M., a minor by and through her 16 guardian, LAUREN BACHTELLWILLARS-MARIEN and successor17 in-interest for Mitchell Marien, 14 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Case No.: CV 10-5203-AHM (JCx) ORDER APPROVING MINOR COMPROMISE OF A DISPUTED CLAIM Hearing Information: Date: January 9, 2012 Time: 10:00 a.m. Judge: A. Howard Matz Ctrm: 14 Plaintiff/Petitioner LAUREN BACHTELL-WILLARS (MARIEN) brought a Petition to Approve Minor Compromise of a Disputed Claim, which was heard on January 9, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 14 of the above-referenced Court, the Honorable A. Howard Matz presiding. Aree Shahparnia appeared on behalf of Plaintiff/Petitioner. Shareef S. Farag appeared on behalf of the Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 1 1 This is a civil rights action accompanied by state law tort claims against the 2 City of Gardena, Gardena Police Department, and Edgar Vargas, an individual. 3 Defendant Edgar Vargas was at all times herein and is an officer employed by the 4 Gardena Police Department. The Complaint seeks damages to redress the violation 5 of Mitchell Marien’s Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable 6 seizure, excessive force and his Fourteenth Amendment rights not to be deprived 7 of his life without due process and equal protection under the laws. The claims 8 arise out of an officer-involved shooting involving Mitchell Marien and Edgar 9 Vargas on or about May 28, 2009. Mitchell Marien was shot and killed during that 10 11 incident. Plaintiff Lauren Bachtell-Willars (Marien) is the widow of the deceased 12 Mitchell Marien. M.V.M. is the daughter and only child of the deceased Mitchell 13 Marien. Lauren Bachtell-Willars (Marien) brings this action on behalf of herself 14 and on behalf of her daughter, M.V.M as M.V.M’s guardian. Plaintiffs bring this 15 action on behalf of Mitchell Marien as his heirs and successors-in-interest. 16 17 18 The parties now wish to settle this matter and have reached a settlement agreement. The principle terms of the settlement are as follows: 1. The Plaintiffs hereby agree to release EDGAR VARGAS and any of his agents, 19 servants employees, officers, directors, subsidiaries, successors, and their attorneys, including 20 Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez, Trester, LLP and any of their attorneys, agents, servants, 21 employees, officers, directors, subsidiaries, and successors from the Lawsuit and agree that this 22 settlement is with the CITY OF GARDENA and the GARDENA POLICE DEPARTMENT only. 23 2. The Plaintiffs hereby agree to accept receipt from the Releasors the sum of one 24 hundred thousand dollars [$100,000.00] (“settlement payment”) as good and valid 25 consideration to settle any and all claims arising from or in any way related to the Incident, the 26 Lawsuit, and the handling and settlement of the Lawsuit by or on behalf of the Defendants, and 27 any and all of the Plaintiffs’ claims therein. The Plaintiffs accept this sum to cover any and all 28 of Plaintiffs’ purported actual damages, fees, costs and expenses–whether past, present, or future–which arise either directly or indirectly out of any Defendants’ involvement in any act or ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 2 1 omission which is in any way related to the Incident or the Lawsuit. 2 The Court having read and considered all papers filed in support of and in 3 opposition to, the Court having heard and considered the proposed compromise, 4 and determining that the compromise settlement and the proposed disposition of 5 the proceeds for the claimant, M.V.M as being fair, reasonable, and in the best 6 interest of the claimant, M.V.M., approves the compromise settlement and makes 7 the following Order: 8 9 10 THE COURT FINDS that the settlement is reasonable and in the parties’ best interests, including the minor, M.V.M.; IT IS ORDERED that the Court approves the compromise settlement and the 11 proposed disposition of the proceeds for the claimant, M.V.M as being fair, 12 reasonable, and in the best interest of the claimant, M.V.M; 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement funds of $100,000.00 shall 14 be divided equally between Plaintiff Lauren Bachtell-Willars (Marien) and 15 Plaintiff M.V.M, each Plaintiff apportioned the sum of $50,000.00; 16 17 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Settlement funds of $100,000.00 shall be issued to the Law Offices of Eric V. Luedtke Client Trust Account; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Law Offices of Eric V. Luedtke shall 19 issue the Settlement funds to Petitioner/Plaintiff Lauren Bachtell-Willars (Marien) 20 on behalf of herself and her daughter-claimant M.V.M.; 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the amount of Claimant’s attorneys’ fees, 22 shall be 35% of the recovery and will be split between Claimant M.V.M and her 23 mother/Petitioner Lauren Bachtell-Willars. Accordingly, the Claimant M.V.M’s 24 attorney’s fees shall be $16,012.69 and Petitioner Lauren Bachtell-Willars 25 attorney’s fees shall be $16,012.69; 26 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the additional items of expense allocated 27 to the minor, in the sum total of $4,249.46, are reasonable and are therefore 28 approved pursuant to this Court Order; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the attorneys’ fees of $16,012.69 and ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 3 1 2 expenses of $4,249.46 shall be paid out of Claimants’ share of the proceeds of the settlement; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that the balance of the proceeds remaining for 3 4 5 6 the Claimant after payment of all requested fees and expenses, in the amount of $29,037.85, shall be distributed to the Claimant, through her mother and guardian Petitioner, Lauren Bachtell-Willars; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, that Petitioner Lauren Bachtell-Willars shall 7 8 9 10 11 12 deposit the sum of $29,037.85, on behalf of the Claimant, into a FDIC insured account at Long Beach Credit Union, subject to withdrawal only upon authorization of the court, or until the minor’s 18th birthday on September 28, 2026. Petitioner shall be the account owner who controls the account for the benefit of the claimant, M.V.M. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner Lauren Bachtell-Willars shall 13 14 15 16 17 18 obtain and file with the Court a receipt showing that the settlement funds of the minor were deposited with Long Beach Credit Union and that Long Beach Credit Union received and acknowledged receiving the Court’s Order and the Settlement Funds. IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 20 Dated: January 26, 2012 Judge of the United States District Court 21 22 _____________________________ JS-6 23 24 25 26 27 28 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ ORDER 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?