Dennis Simpson v. John E. Potter et al

Filing 81

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT by Judge A. Howard Matz. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, came on regularly for hearing on 7/16/2012, before the Court. The Court having considered the pleadings, evidence presented, memorandum of points and author ities and the oral argument at the time of the hearing, and in accordance with the Court's 7/26/2012, Summary Judgment Order (Dkt. 80 ) HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant on all causes of action. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DENNIS SIMPSON 12 13 Plaintiff, vs. 14 PATRICK R. DONAHOE, POSTMASTER GENERAL, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) Case No. CV10-05207 AHM (PJWx) ) ) JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT ) ) ) Hon. A. Howard Matz ) ) ) ) ) ) Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, came on regularly for hearing on July 16, 2012, before the Court. The Court having considered the pleadings, evidence presented, memorandum of points and authorities and the oral argument at the time of the hearing, and in accordance with the Court’s July 26, 2012, Summary Judgment Order (Dkt. 80) HEREBY ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND DECREES that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant on all causes of action. 24 25 DATED: August 7, 2012 26 27 28 A. HOWARD MATZ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?