In Re Quantcast Advertising Cookie Litigation
Filing
32
DENIED BY ORDER OF THE COURT WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THIS TIME by Judge George H Wu, re Stipulation to Continue, #30 (pj)
<![CDATA[
Edward Valdez et al v. Quantcast Corporation et al
Doc. 32
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THIS TIME
DENIED
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA In Re Quantcast Advertising Cookie Litigt. CASE NO.: 2:10-cv-05484-GW [Proposed] ORDER RE DATE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A CONSOLIDATED AMENDED COMPLAINT
Pursuant to the stipulation between and among the parties, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court orders as follows: This Court's Order entered September 21, 2010, is amended as follows: On or before November 19, 2010, the Plaintiffs shall file their Consolidated Amended Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 15, 2010
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
WITHOUT PREJUDICE AT THIS TIME. ___________________________________ George H. Wu Judge of the United States District Court
DENIED
Dockets.Justia.com
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
