Patrick Duffey v. Michael J. Astrue
Filing
17
ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky, Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees, 16 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2,300.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of ($410.00) as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded to Plaintiff. (mz)
1
2
3
4
5
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney at Law: 119433
Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing
12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
Tel.: (562)868-5886
Fax: (562)868-8868
E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Patrick Duffey
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
PATRICK DUFFEY,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
vs.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
14
Defendant
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: CV 10-6426 RZ
{PROPOSED} ORDER AWARDING
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES
PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28
U.S.C. § 1920
16
17
18
Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses:
19
IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2,300.00 as
20
authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of ($410.00) as authorized
21
by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. to
22
Plaintiff.
23
DATE: November 10, 2011
24
25
___________________________________
THE HONORABLE RALPH ZAREFSKY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
-1-
1
Respectfully submitted,
2
LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing
3
4
/s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing
_________________________
Lawrence D. Rohlfing
Attorney for plaintiff Patrick Duffey
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?