Patrick Duffey v. Michael J. Astrue

Filing 17

ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky, Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees, 16 . IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2,300.00 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of ($410.00) as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded to Plaintiff. (mz)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney at Law: 119433 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing 12631 East Imperial Highway, Suite C-115Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 Tel.: (562)868-5886 Fax: (562)868-8868 E-mail: rohlfing.office@rohlfinglaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Patrick Duffey 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PATRICK DUFFEY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 vs. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, 14 Defendant 15 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: CV 10-6426 RZ {PROPOSED} ORDER AWARDING EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920 16 17 18 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs, and Expenses: 19 IT IS ORDERED that fees and expenses in the amount of $2,300.00 as 20 authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412 and costs in the amount of ($410.00) as authorized 21 by 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of the Stipulation. to 22 Plaintiff. 23 DATE: November 10, 2011 24 25 ___________________________________ THE HONORABLE RALPH ZAREFSKY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 -1- 1 Respectfully submitted, 2 LAW OFFICES OF Lawrence D. Rohlfing 3 4 /s/ Lawrence D. Rohlfing _________________________ Lawrence D. Rohlfing Attorney for plaintiff Patrick Duffey 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?