V-Dot Technologies LLC v. Acer, Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge John F. Walter and granting Stipulation to Dismiss Party 79 Case Terminated. Made JS-6., Hewlett-Packard Co., Hewlett-Packard Co., Hewlett-Packard Co., Hewlett-Packard Co. and Hewlett-Packard Co. terminated. (se)

JS-6

1
UNITED STATES D
U
DISTRICT COURT
T

2
3

TRAL DIS
STRICT OF CALIF
O
FORNIA - WESTER DIVIS
RN
SION
CENT

-DOT TEC
CHNOLOG
GIES LLC,
,
4 V-

CV
36-JFW (C
CWx)
Case No. C 10-643

5

GRANTIN STIPU
NG
ULATION
N
ORDER G
AND JOI
INT MOTION TO D
DISMISS
HEWLET
TT-PACK
KARD CO.

6

Plaintiff,
vs.

7
CER, INC. ACER AMERICA
.,
A
8 AC
CO
ORP., ACE AMER
ER
RICAN
9 HO
OLDING CORP., GA
C
ATEWAY, INC.,
ND
LETT-PAC
CKARD CO
O.,
10 AN HEWL
11

Defendant
ts.

12
13
14

Before the Court is Plaintif V-Dot T
e
t
ff
Technologies LLC (“V
V-DOT”) a
and

efendant Hewlett-Pac
H
ckard Co. (“HP”) Stip
(
pulation an Joint M
nd
Motion to D
Dismiss
15 De
ch
TED.
16 Without Prejudice. Suc motion is GRANT
17

PURSUANT TO STIPULA
O
ATION, IT IS HERE
T
EBY ORDE
ERED that
t:

18

(1)

All claims here at iss betwee V-DOT and HP re
s
sue
en
T
esolved by the terms

ns
S
a
se
ment
as
xecuted
19 and condition of the Settlement and Licens Agreem that wa fully ex
tween V-D
DOT and on of HP's suppliers on January 11, 2012, are dismi
ne
y
issed with
20 bet
ejudice; an
nd
21 pre
(2) All other claims not resolved b the term and cond
c
by
ms
ditions of t
the
22
ettlement an License Agreement are dism
nd
e
missed with
hout prejud
dice;
23 Se
(3) V-DOT an HP each shall bea their own costs and attorneys fees.
nd
h
ar
n
d
s’
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
S

26

DATE January 19, 2012
ED:
y
2

_______
_________
__________
________

27

HON. JO
OHN F. W
WALTER

28

UNITED STATES DISTRIC JUDGE
D
S
CT
E
McK
Kool 405785v1

C 10-6436-JF (CWx)
CV
FW
STIPULATIO AND JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS HE
ON
NT
O
EWLETT PACK
KARD CO.