Leticia Lopez v. United Stationers Supply Co. et al
Filing
23
JUDGMENT by Judge Dale S. Fischer, in favor of Leticia Lopez against United Stationers Supply Co. Related to: Notice of Lodging Judgment 22 . IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be, and here is, entered in favor of Plaintiff Leticia Lo pez and against Defendant United Stationers Supply Company, in the amount of Thirty Thousand and One Dollars ($30,001.00),inclusive of any and all claims and issues against Defendant arising out of, alleged in, or related to, the facts and transactions alleged in the Complaint in this action. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall issue a check (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
STEVEN A. GROODE, Bar No. 210500
MATTHEW J. SHARBAUGH, Bar No. 260830
LITTLER MENDELSON
A Professional Corporation
2049 Century Park East, 5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
Telephone: 310.553.0308
Facsimile: 310.553.5583
E-mail:
sgroode@littler.com;
msharbaugh@littler.com
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATIONERS SUPPLY CO.
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
LETICIA LOPEZ, an individual,
Plaintiff,
12
v.
14
UNITED STATIONERS SUPPLY
CO., a corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308
Case No. CV10-6544 DSF (CWx)
JUDGMENT
[FED. R. CIV. P. 58, 68(a)]
13
15
JS 6
Defendants.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
LETICIA LOPEZ, an individual,
13
14
15
16
17
18
Case No. CV10-6544 DSF (CWx)
JUDGMENT
Plaintiff,
[FED. R. CIV. P. 58, 68(a)]
v.
UNITED STATIONERS SUPPLY
CO., a corporation; and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308
2.
1
The Court takes notice that on April 25, 2010, Defendant United Stationers
2
Supply Company (“Defendant”) served on Plaintiff Leticia Lopez (“Plaintiff”) an
3
Offer of Judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68(a). Thereafter,
4
Plaintiff timely served her written Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment on May
5
4, 2011, and filed same with the Court. The Court, having reviewed the Offer of
6
Judgment and the Notice of Acceptance of Offer of Judgment, and finding good cause
7
therefore, hereby enters judgment as follows:
8
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that judgment be, and here
9
is, entered in favor of Plaintiff Leticia Lopez and against Defendant United Stationers
10
Supply Company, in the amount of Thirty Thousand and One Dollars ($30,001.00),
11
inclusive of any and all claims and issues against Defendant arising out of, alleged in,
12
or related to, the facts and transactions alleged in the Complaint in this action.
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant shall issue a check made
14
payable to “Leticia Lopez” for the above-listed amount, which represents the entire
15
sum to which Plaintiff is entitled pursuant to Defendant’s Offer of Judgment, inclusive
16
of attorneys’ fees, and potential expert witness fees, and any and all other costs. This
17
check shall be sent to Plaintiff’s counsel of record with fourteen (14) calendar days
18
after entry of this Judgment.
19
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant’s Offer of Judgment
20
pursuant to Rule 68(a) does not constitute any admission of liability on the part of
21
Defendant, or an admission, directly or by implication, that Defendant violated any
22
law, rule, regulation or contractual right, duty or obligation owed to Plaintiff, or that
23
Plaintiff suffered any damages in connection with the claims set forth in the
24
Complaint.
25
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: _5/10, 2011
HON. DALE S. FISCHER
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
27
28
LITTLER MENDELSON
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
2049 Century Park East
5th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90067.3107
310.553.0308
1.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?