Nikolai Grigoriev v. Dov Charney et al - IN RE AMERICAN APPAREL, INC. SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE LITIGATION

Filing 66

CIVIL JUDGMENT by Judge Margaret M. Morrow, it is hereby, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Courts Order, with no amended complaint having been filed, the motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative complaint is granted and this action is dismissed. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (jp)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 IN RE AMERICAN APPAREL, INC. 8 SHAREHOLDER DERIVATIVE 9 LITIGATION 10 This Document Relates To: 11 Case No. 10-CV-6576 MMM (RCx) [PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT ALL ACTIONS 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Judge: Hon. Margaret M. Morrow Defendants having moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ complaint, and the Court, on July 31, 2012, having issued an Order Granting Defendants’ Motions To Dismiss; Denying Nominal Defendant American Apparel’s Motion To Stay [Doc. 63, Filed 7/31/12] (the “Order”), which Order permitted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint by August 30, 2012, and plaintiffs, having declined to file an amended complaint and moving for entry of final judgment on August 29, 2012, from which to appeal the Order, it is hereby, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court’s Order, with no amended complaint having been filed, the motion to dismiss the consolidated derivative complaint is granted and this action is dismissed. DATED: October 15, 2012 ____________________________ Margaret M. Morrow UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 [PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 2 [PROPOSED] CIVIL JUDGMENT 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?