Jorge Gaxiola et al v. City of Los Angeles et al

Filing 126

JUDGMENT by Judge A. Howard Matz, Related to: ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 125 . See document for details. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

JORGE GAXIOLA, et al.,

12

Plaintiffs,

13
14

v.
CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,

15
Defendants.

16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

NO. CV 10-6632 AHM (FMO)

JUDGMENT

18

IT IS ADJUDGED that plaintiffs’ Complaint is dismissed without prejudice as to plaintiff

19

Michael Frost; Claim Three of the Complaint and plaintiffs’ claims against the Federal Transit

20

Authority, the Federal Highway Administration, Victor Mendez and Peter M. Rogoff are dismissed

21

for lack of subject matter jurisdiction; Claims One, Two and Nine against Malcolm Dougherty, and

22

Claims One, Seven, Eight, Nine and Thirteen, and the § 1983 claim set forth in Claim Two against

23

State of California, Department of Transportation are dismissed on Eleventh Amendment grounds;

24

plaintiffs’ state law claims are dismissed without prejudice; and all other claims are dismissed with

25

prejudice.

26

DATED: September 30, 2011

27

JS-6

28

A. HOWARD MATZ
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE