Joan Hoyman et al v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al

Filing 14

MINUTE IN CHAMBERS by Judge A. Howard Matz: On 10/5/2010, Aurora filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim. With the motion to dismiss pending, Plaintiffs sought leave to file a first amended complaint. The Court granted Plainti ffs leave to file a first amended complaint by not later than 11/15/2010. Plaintiffs did not file a first amended complaint by the deadline. Instead, on 11/16/2010, Plaintiffs filed an application for an extension of time to file a first amended comp laint. The Court granted Plaintiffs an extension of time and ordered Plaintiffs to file the complaint by not later than 12/6/2010. Plaintiffs again have failed to file a first amended complaint by the ordered deadline. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the action with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (jp)

-MAN Joan Hoyman et al v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al

Doc. 14

O UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. Title CV 10-7184 AHM (MANx) Date December 10, 2010 JOAN HOYMAN, et al. v. AURORA LOAN SERVICES LLC, et al.

Present: The Honorable Stephen Montes Deputy Clerk

A. HOWARD MATZ, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Not Reported Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No. Attorneys NOT Present for Defendants:

Attorneys NOT Present for Plaintiffs:

Proceedings:

IN CHAMBERS (No Proceedings Held)

On September 1, 2010, Plaintiffs filed a complaint in Los Angeles County Superior Court. On September 27, 2010, defendant Aurora Loan Services LLC ("Aurora") removed the case to this Court. On October 5, 2010, Aurora filed a motion to dismiss the case for failure to state a claim. With the motion to dismiss pending, Plaintiffs sought leave to file a first amended complaint. The Court granted Plaintiffs leave to file a first amended complaint by not later than November 15, 2010. Plaintiffs did not file a first amended complaint by the deadline. Instead, on November 16, 2010, Plaintiffs filed an application for an extension of time to file a first amended complaint. The Court granted Plaintiffs an extension of time and ordered Plaintiffs to file the complaint by not later than December 6, 2010. Plaintiffs again have failed to file a first amended complaint by the ordered deadline. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES the action with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file. JS-6
: Initials of Preparer SMO

CV-90 (06/04)

CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL

Page 1 of 1

Dockets.Justia.com