Navaro Medical Solutions Inc. et al v. Glenoaks Billing Inc. et al

Filing 107

JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt: IT IS ORDERED THAT Plaintiff Medical Solutions Inc shall take nothing in their claims against Defendant Dwight Hiscox. Plaintiffs are to pay defendnt Hiscox $10,000.00 for attorneys; fees by May 1, 2012. (See order for further details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (shb)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JS-6

6
7

NAVARO MEDICAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and RICHARD NAVARO,

8
9

Plaintiffs,

JUDGMENT

vs.

10
11
12

Case No. CV10-07668-JAK (RZx)

GLENOAKS BILLING, INC., DR.
DWIGHT HISCOX, MICHAEL
ELLIS and BETH ELLIS,

13

Date: April 2, 2012
Time: 8:30 a.m.
Place: Department 750
Judge: Hon. John A. Kronstadt

Defendants.

14
15

GLENOAKS BILLING, INC.,
MICHAEL ELLIS and BETH ELLIS,

16
17

Counterclaimants,
vs.

18
19

NAVARO MEDICAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and RICHARD NAVARO,

20
21

Counterdefendants.
DR. DWIGHT HISCOX

22
23

Counterclaimant,
vs.

24
25
26

NAVARO MEDICAL SOLUTIONS,
INC. and RICHARD NAVARO,
Counterdefendants.

27
28
1
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT

Pursu to the Court’s April 2, 201 Order gr
uant
A
12
ranting in p Defen
part
ndant

1
2

Dwight Hiscox’s motion for attorneys’ fees, the p
m
r
parties sub
bmit the fo
ollowing

3

propose judgmen
ed
nt:

4

IT IS ORDE
T
ERED, AD
DJUDGED AND DE
D
ECREED T
THAT:

5

1.

6
7
8
9
10
0
11
12

Pursu to the Court’s Se
uant
eptember 1 2011 O
15,
Order grant
ting Hiscox
x’s

motion for summa judgme (Docke No. 66), judgment is hereby e
ary
ent
et
entered in
favor of Hiscox on all the claims asser by Pla
f
n
rted
aintiffs Rich
hard Nava and Nav
aro
varo
Medical Solutions Inc. agai Defend Dwigh Hiscox. Plaintiffs shall take
s,
inst
dant
ht
s
e
nothing in their claims again Hiscox.
g
nst
.
2.
2

Pursu to the January 9, 2012 Ord of the C
uant
der
Court (Doc No. 96
cket
6),

Defenda Hiscox counter
ant
x’s
rclaims aga
ainst Plaint
tiffs Richar Navaro and Navar
rd
ro
Medical Solutions Inc. are dismissed without pr
s,
d
w
rejudice an without conditions
nd
s.
3.

Pursu to a co
uant
onfidential settlemen agreemen between Defendan
l
nt
nt
n
nts

13

Glenoak Billing, Inc., Mich Ellis and Beth E
ks
hael
a
Ellis, on the one hand, and Plain
e
ntiffs

14
4

Richard Navaro an Navaro Medical Solutions, I
d
nd
S
Inc., on the other han the clai
e
nd,
ims

15

and cou
unterclaims between these parties have be dismiss with pr
s
t
een
sed
rejudice.

16
6

4.
4

Pursu to the Court’s Order of Ap 2, 2012 regarding Hiscox’s
uant
O
pril
2
g

17

motion for attorne fees un
eys’
nder the Copyright A Plainti are to p Hiscox
Act,
iffs
pay
x

18

$10,000 in attorne fees by May 1, 2012.
0
eys’
y
2

19

5.

The Court has not ruled on Defenda Hiscox’s request t be
C
n
o
ant
to

20
0

identifie as the prevailing party for pu
ed
p
urposes of filing a m
f
motion for c
costs. The

21

Court en
ncouraged the parties to further discuss se
d
s
r
ettlement a file any motions for
and
y

22

costs if those talks are not su
s
uccessful.

23

IT IS SO ORDERED.
T

24
4
25
26
6

Dated: April 17, 2012
A
2

By:______
__________
_________
_________
___
Hon John A. Kronstadt
n.
t
Uni
ited States District Court Judge
e

27
28
2
[PROPOS
SED] JUDGM
MENT

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Submitted by:
A. Eric Bjorgum, State Bar No. 198392
Marc Karish, State Bar No. 205440
KARISH & BJORGUM, PC
238 E. Union St., Suite A
Pasadena, CA 91101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 213.995.5010
Email:[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant DWIGHT HISCOX, M.D.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
[PROPOSED] JUDGMENT