Jeremy A. Moore v. County of Los Angeles et al

Filing 84

JUDGMENT by Judge Otis D Wright, II. After consideration of the parties papers and evidence submitted for Defendant County of Los Angeless Motion for Summary Judgment 50 , IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff Jeremy A. Moore takes nothing; 2. Judgment for Defendant County of Los Angeles; 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (cch)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY A. MOORE, 12 13 14 15 v. Plaintiff, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, PETER BLISS, PAM BOOTH, JACQUELYN LACEY, JOHN SPILLANE, and JULIE DIXON SILVA, Defendants. 16 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// Case No. 2:10-cv-07694-ODW(SS) JUDGMENT 1 After consideration of the parties’ papers and evidence submitted for Defendant 2 County of Los Angeles’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 50), IT IS 3 HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. Plaintiff Jeremy A. Moore takes nothing; 5 2. Judgment for Defendant County of Los Angeles; 6 3. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 August 20, 2012 10 11 12 13 ____________________________________ OTIS D. WRIGHT, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?