Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al

Filing 27

ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Request to Substitute Attorney Jeffrey S Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP in place and stead of Attorney Christopher Thomas Casamassima 25 GRANTED. (ir)

Download PDF
Christopher Casamassima (SBN 211280) KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP 333 South Hope Street Los Angeles, CA 90071 Tel: (213) 680-8353, Fax: (213) 680-8500 Email: chris.casamassima@kirkland.com Attorneys for Defendant TCS Education System E-FILED 04-11-2011 LINK TO DOC. # 25 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER: CV10-8026 Southern California Institute of Law Plaintiff(s) v. ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY TCS Education System Defendant(s). The Court hereby orders that the request of: Plaintiff TCS Education System Defendant Other Name of Party to substitute Jeffrey S. Whittington, Esq., of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP Retained Counsel who is G Counsel appointed by the Court (Criminal cases only) Pro Se 23975 Park Sorrento, Suite 370 Street Address Calabasas, CA 91302 jwhittington@kbrlaw.com City, State, Zip E-Mail Address (818) 880-0992 (818) 880-0993 Telephone Number 236028 Fax Number as attorney of record in place and stead of State Bar Number Christopher Casamassima, Esq., of Kirkland & Ellis LLP Present Attorney is hereby X GRANTED Dated 4/15/11 DENIED PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ U. S. District Judge NOTICE TO COUNSEL: IF YOU ARE CURRENTLY ENROLLED IN THE OPTICAL SCANNING PROGRAM AND HAVE CHANGED YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS SINCE YOUR ENROLLMENT, YOU MUST COMPLETE AN ENROLLMENT/UPDATE FORM (G-76) TO ENSURE THAT DOCUMENTS ARE SERVED AT THE PROPER E-MAIL ADDRESS. THIS FORM, AS WELL AS INFORMATION ABOUT THE OPTICAL SCANNING PROGRAM IS AVAILABLE ON THE COURT=S WEBSITE AT WWW.CACD.USCOURTS.GOV. GB01 ORDER (06/05) ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY 1501976

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?