Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al
Filing
27
ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Request to Substitute Attorney Jeffrey S Whittington of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP in place and stead of Attorney Christopher Thomas Casamassima 25 GRANTED. (ir)
Christopher Casamassima (SBN 211280)
KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP
333 South Hope Street
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Tel: (213) 680-8353, Fax: (213) 680-8500
Email: chris.casamassima@kirkland.com
Attorneys for Defendant TCS Education System
E-FILED 04-11-2011
LINK TO DOC. # 25
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER:
CV10-8026
Southern California Institute of Law
Plaintiff(s)
v.
ORDER ON
REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
TCS Education System
Defendant(s).
The Court hereby orders that the request of:
Plaintiff
TCS Education System
Defendant
Other
Name of Party
to substitute
Jeffrey S. Whittington, Esq., of Kaufman Borgeest & Ryan LLP
Retained Counsel
who is
G Counsel appointed by the Court (Criminal cases only)
Pro Se
23975 Park Sorrento, Suite 370
Street Address
Calabasas, CA 91302
jwhittington@kbrlaw.com
City, State, Zip
E-Mail Address
(818) 880-0992
(818) 880-0993
Telephone Number
236028
Fax Number
as attorney of record in place and stead of
State Bar Number
Christopher Casamassima, Esq., of Kirkland & Ellis LLP
Present Attorney
is hereby
X GRANTED
Dated 4/15/11
DENIED
PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ
U. S. District Judge
NOTICE TO COUNSEL: IF YOU ARE CURRENTLY ENROLLED IN THE OPTICAL SCANNING PROGRAM AND HAVE
CHANGED YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS SINCE YOUR ENROLLMENT, YOU MUST COMPLETE AN ENROLLMENT/UPDATE
FORM (G-76) TO ENSURE THAT DOCUMENTS ARE SERVED AT THE PROPER E-MAIL ADDRESS. THIS FORM, AS WELL
AS INFORMATION ABOUT THE OPTICAL SCANNING PROGRAM IS AVAILABLE ON THE COURT=S WEBSITE AT
WWW.CACD.USCOURTS.GOV.
GB01 ORDER (06/05)
ORDER ON REQUEST FOR APPROVAL OF SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
1501976
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?