Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al

Filing 56

ORDER by Clerk of Court The document is stricken. Counsel is ordered to lodge the proposed order by July 8, 2011. In the future, proposed orders shall be filed as an attachment to the motion to which it references. Counsel are to take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. RE: MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) 53 (shb)

Download PDF
CLEAR FORM UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW, PLAINTIFF(S) v. TCS EDUCATION SYSTEM, et al., DEFENDANT(S). CASE NUMBER LA CV10-08026 JAK (AJWx) RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS In accordance with the Notice to Filer Of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents REGARDING: 07/05/2011 Date Filed 53 Doc. No. Notice of Motion and Motion for Order Title of Doc. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: G The document is accepted as filed G The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or corrected document by . G The hearing date has been rescheduled to G Other at The document is stricken. Counsel is ordered to lodge the proposed order by July 8, 2011. In the future, proposed orders shall be filed as an attachment to the motion to which it references. Counsel are to take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. Clerk, U.S. District Court Dated: July 6, 2011 By: Andrea Keifer Deputy Clerk cc: Assigned District Judge and/or Magistrate Judge RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS G-112B (01/07)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?