Southern California Institute of Law v. TCS Education System et al
Filing
56
ORDER by Clerk of Court The document is stricken. Counsel is ordered to lodge the proposed order by July 8, 2011. In the future, proposed orders shall be filed as an attachment to the motion to which it references. Counsel are to take notice of the CM/ECF procedures. RE: MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) MOTION for Order for Proposed Order Granting Defendants Figuli and Global Equities's Motion to Dismiss Portions of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to FRCP 12(b)(6) 53 (shb)
CLEAR FORM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF LAW,
PLAINTIFF(S)
v.
TCS EDUCATION SYSTEM, et al.,
DEFENDANT(S).
CASE NUMBER
LA CV10-08026 JAK (AJWx)
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO
FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN
ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS
In accordance with the Notice to Filer Of Deficiencies In Electronically Filed Documents
REGARDING:
07/05/2011
Date Filed
53
Doc. No.
Notice of Motion and Motion for Order
Title of Doc.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
G The document is accepted as filed
G The document is stricken and counsel is ordered to file an amended or
corrected document by
.
G The hearing date has been rescheduled to
G Other
at
The document is stricken. Counsel is ordered to lodge the proposed order by July 8, 2011. In the
future, proposed orders shall be filed as an attachment to the motion to which it references. Counsel
are to take notice of the CM/ECF procedures.
Clerk, U.S. District Court
Dated: July 6, 2011
By: Andrea Keifer
Deputy Clerk
cc: Assigned District Judge and/or Magistrate Judge
RESPONSE BY THE COURT TO NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES IN ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOCUMENTS
G-112B (01/07)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?