Alex Shpisman v. EnvisionTEC GmbH et al

Filing 29

ORDER RE ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Manuel L. Real (pj)

Download PDF
& LIANG APLC 1 LEE TRANHansen (Bar No. 198401) Steven R. Enoch H. Liang (Bar 2 601 S. Figueroa Street,No. 212324) Suite 4025 Los Angeles, California 90017 3 Telephone: (213) 612-3737 4 Facsimile: (213) 612-3773 ehl@ltlcounsel.com E-mail: srh@ltlcounsel.com; 5 6 Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff Envisiontec, Inc. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – WESTERN 10 11 ALEX SHPISMAN, an individual, CASE NO. CV10 8355 R (PJWx) 12 ORDER RE: ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ENVISIONTEC GmbH, an entity of ) unknown origin, ENVISIONTEC, INC., a ) Michigan corporation. ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) ENVISIONTEC, INC., a Michigan ) corporation, ) ) Counterclaim Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ALEX SHIPISMAN, an individual, ) ) Counterclaim Defendant. ) ) ) ) DATE: May 2, 2011 TIME: 10:00 a.m. CTRM: 8 Action Filed: November 3, 2010 First Amended Complaint Filed: December 22, 2010 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Envisiontec, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order came on for regular hearing on May 2, 2011 at 10 a.m. before this Court. Having considered the parties’ joint stipulation, any oppositions and replies thereto, the oral argument of the parties’ during the hearing, and for the reasons expressed on the record during the hearing, it is hereby ORDERED that Envisiontec, Inc.’s Motion for Protective Order is granted. It is hereby ORDERED that the protective order attached as Exhibit “1” to this Order is entered. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 15 DATED: May 11, 2011 ________________________________________ Hon. Manuel L. Real UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: ENTRY OF PROTECTIVE ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?