Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mack et al
Filing
124
FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT STEVEN ENRICO LOPEZ, SR. by Judge Dale S. Fischer: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable fordisgorgement of $577,000, representing profits gained as a result of the conductalleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $40,219.55, and a civil penalty in the amount of $150,000 pursuant to Section 21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. 78u(d)(3)(A)], Section 20 of the Securities Act [15 U.S.C. 77t(d)(2)], and Section 209(e) of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. 80b-9(e)]. (See order for further details). (shb)
1
2
3
4
5
JS 6
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
14
Plaintiff,
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
vs.
ALERO ODELL MACK, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. CV 10-8383-DSF (PJWx)
FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST
DEFENDANT STEVEN ENRICO
LOPEZ, SR.
1
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint and
2
Defendant Steven Enrico Lopez, Sr. having entered a general appearance; consented
3
to the Court’s jurisdiction over Defendant and the subject matter of this action;
4
consented to entry of this Final Judgment without admitting or denying the
5
allegations of the Complaint (except as to jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and
6
conclusions of law; and waived any right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant is liable for
7
8
disgorgement of $577,000, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct
9
alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of
10
$40,219.55, and a civil penalty in the amount of $150,000 pursuant to Section
11
21(d)(3) of the Exchange Act [15 U.S.C. § 78u(d)(3)(A)], Section 20 of the Securities
12
Act [15 U.S.C. §77t(d)(2)], and Section 209(e) of the Advisers Act [15 U.S.C. § 80b-
13
9(e)].
14
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court
15
shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this
16
Final Judgment.
17
18
19
September 1. 2016
______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
DALE S. FISCHER
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?