Christopher Powell v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc et al

Filing 6

ORDER DISMISSING CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer, GRANTING Stipulation to Dismiss Case 5 . Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (shb)

Download PDF
-MAN Christopher Powell v. Securitas Security Services USA Inc et al Doc. 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Thomas P. Brown IV State Bar No.97315 tbrown@browngitt.com Sherry B. Shavit State Bar No.193222 sshavit@browngitt.com Ani M. Akopyan State Bar No.234158 aakopyan@browngitt.com BROWN GITT LAW GROUP, LLP 300 North Lake Avenue, Suite 200 Pasadena, California 91101 Telephone: 626.229.1919 Facsimile: 626.229.1917 JS 6 Attorneys for Defendant SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC. Jay S. Rothman, Esq. lawyers@jayrothmanlaw.com 10 JAY S. ROTHMAN & ASSOCIATES 21900 Burbank Blvd., Suite 210 11 Woodland Hills, CA 91367 Telephone: 818.986.7870 12 Facsimile: 818.990.3019 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Attorneys for Plaintiff CHRISTOPER POWELL JS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA-CENTRAL DIVISION CHRISTOPHER POWELL, an individual, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV10-8403 DSF (MANx) (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC445055) PROPOSED ORDER TO JOINT STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL v. 21 SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation, 22 and DOES 1, to 50, inclusive, 23 24 25 26 27 28 Defendants. Having received and reviewed Plaintiff CHRISTOPHER POWELL's and Defendant SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC.'s Joint Stipulation of Dismissal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41, this Court rules as PROPOSED ORDER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 follows: 1. This matter is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice. Dated:__12/1/10________________ __________________________________ HONORABLE DALE S. FISCHER Judge of the United States District Court -2PROPOSED ORDER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?