Kirsten Heilemann et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al

Filing 51

JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION by Judge George H Wu: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing from Defendant Bank of America, that Bank of America is entitled to recover its allowable costs, that th e parties shall be responsible for their own attorneys fees in all proceedings to date before this Court, and that this action is dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice to the claims of Plaintiffs Kirsten Heilemann and Marcella Lees. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rrey)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 TERRY E. SANCHEZ (State Bar No. 101318) Terry.Sanchez@mto.com ROBERT L. DELL ANGELO (State Bar No. 160409) Robert.DellAngelo@mto.com SHOSHANA E. BANNETT (State Bar No. 241977) Shoshana. Bannett@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 355 South Grand Avenue, Thirty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560 Telephone: (213) 683-9100 Facsimile: (213) 687-3702 JS-6 MALCOLM A. HEINICKE (State Bar No. 194174) Malcolm.Heinicke@mto.com MUNGER, TOLLES & OLSON LLP 560 Mission Street, Twenty-Seventh Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-2907 Telephone: (415) 512-4000 Facsimile: (415) 512-4077 Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 15 16 17 18 KIRSTEN HEILEMANN, an individual, and MARCELLA LEES, an individual, on behalf of themselves and other similarly situated, 19 20 21 22 Plaintiffs, vs. CASE NO. CV-10-8623-GW (JCX) JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANT BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION Judge: Hon. George H. Wu BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation; DOES 1-50, inclusive, 23 Defendants. 24 25 26 27 28 14146619.1 [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT CV-10-8623 GW (JCx) 1 Defendant Bank of America Corporation’s Motion to Dismiss the First 2 Amended Complaint came on for hearing on June 6, 2011. Following the hearing, 3 the Court issued an order Defendant Bank of America Corporation’s Motion to 4 Dismiss the First Amended Complaint without leave to amend. The First Amended 5 Complaint is therefore dismissed without leave to amend and with prejudice to the 6 named Plaintiffs' claims. This document shall constitute a judgment for purposes of 7 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, Rule 58. 8 FOR THE FOREGOING REASONS, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, 9 ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Plaintiffs take nothing from Defendant Bank 10 of America, that Bank of America is entitled to recover its allowable costs, that the 11 parties shall be responsible for their own attorneys’ fees in all proceedings to date 12 before this Court, and that this action is dismissed without leave to amend and with 13 prejudice to the claims of Plaintiffs Kirsten Heilemann and Marcella Lees. 14 15 Dated: June 9, 2011 _______________________________ GEORGE H. WU, U.S. District Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 Submitted by: Munger, Tolles & Olson LLP 22 By: 23 24 /s/ Malcolm A. Heinicke Malcolm A. Heinicke Attorneys for Defendant BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 25 26 27 28 14146619.1 -1- [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT CV-10-8623 GW (JCx)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?