Nancy Radin v. Darlne Hunt et al
Filing
110
AMENDED JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt. Plaintiff's claim is hereby dismissed with prejudice. Defendants Showtime Networks, Inc. and Darlene Hunt shall recover from Plaintiff Nancy Radin the amount of $1268.45 and attorneys fees of $34,975.00, for a total judgment of $36,243.45. Defendants' motion for Rule 11 sanctions are denied. (mg)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
NANCY RADIN,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
vs.
DARLENE HUNT, SHOWTIME
NETWORKS INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
16
Defendants.
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 10-08838 JAK (SSx)
Assigned to Hon. John A. Kronstadt
AMENDED JUDGMENT
Complaint Filed: 11/17/10
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Loeb & Loeb
A Limited Liability Partnership
Including Professional
Corporations
LA2209535.1
208491-10008
[Proposed] Amended Judgment
Case No. CV 10-08838 JAK (SSx)
1
The Motion for Summary Judgment, the Motio for Attor
M
S
J
on
rneys’ Fee under
es
2
the Copyrigh Act (17 U.S.C. § 505), and th Motion for Rule 11 sanctio
e
ht
U
5
the
ns
ons
3
sub
bmitted by Defendan DARLE
y
nts
ENE HUN AND SH
NT
HOWTIME NETWO
E
ORKS
4
IN came on regularly for decisi before the Honor
NC.
y
ion
rable John A. Kronstadt, U.S.
5
Di
istrict Judg and the submissions of the p
ge,
parties havi been fu consid
ing
ully
dered, the
6
iss
sues having been duly heard, an a decisio having been duly rendered,
g
y
nd
on
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND AD
H
D
DJUDGED AND DE
D
ECREED t
that
8
Pla
aintiff’s cla is here dismissed with p
aim
eby
prejudice an that Def
nd
fendants sh
hall
9
rec
cover their costs from Plaintiff in the amo
r
m
ount of one thousand two hundr sixty
e
red
10
11
eig dollars and forty five cents ($1,268.45
ght
f
5);
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND AD
H
D
DJUDGED AND DE
D
ECREED t
that
12
Pla
aintiff mus pay to Defendants attorneys’ fees in the amount o thirty fou
st
e
of
ur
13
tho
ousand nin hundred seventy fi dollars ($34,975.0 and
ne
ive
00);
14
15
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND AD
H
D
DJUDGED AND DE
D
ECREED t
that
De
efendants’ motions fo Rule 11 sanctions are denied
or
d.
16
17
18
ated: Marc 27, 2012
ch
2
Da
19
Hono
orable John A. Krons
n
stadt
U.S. District Court Judge
e
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Loeb & Lo
oeb
A Limited Liability P
Partnership
Including Profes
ssional
Corporation
ns
LA2
2209535.1
2084
491-10008
1
[P
Proposed] Ame
ended Judgmen
nt
Case No. CV 10-08
8838 JAK (SSx
x)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?