Rosendo Garnery v. F V Midnight Hour et al
Filing
4
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Gary A. Feess: Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/8/2011. (rfi)
LINK:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Case No.
CV 10-09428-GAF (RZx)
Title
Rosendo Garnery v. F V Midnight Hour et al
Present: The Honorable
Date
May 19, 2011
GARY ALLEN FEESS
Renee Fisher
Deputy Clerk
None
Court Reporter / Recorder
N/A
Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs:
Attorneys Present for Defendants:
None
None
Proceedings:
(In Chambers)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE: DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION
Plaintiff(s) are ORDERED to show cause why this case should not be dismissed, for lack
of prosecution. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 (1962) (court has inherent power to
dismiss for lack of prosecution on its own motion). In this matter:
:
Plaintiff(s) have failed to file a proof of service within 120 days of the filing of
the Complaint. Plaintiff(s) can satisfy this order by showing that service was
effectuated within the 120 day deadline or by showing good cause for the failure to
do so. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m).
Plaintiffs must respond to this order within 20 days. Failure to respond to this OSC
will be deemed consent to the dismissal of the action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CV-90 (06/04)
CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?