George Clinton v. Will Adams et al
Filing
101
JOINDER filed by Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. joining in Witness List 99 . (Burrow, Linda)
1 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
LINDA M. BURROW, State Bar No. 194668
burrow@caldwell-leslie.com
2
ALISON MACKENZIE, State Bar No. 242280
mackenzie@caldwell-leslie.com
3
1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600
4 Los Angeles, California 90017-2463
Telephone: (213) 629-9040
5 Facsimile: (213) 629-9022
6 Attorneys for Defendant UMG
RECORDINGS, INC.
7 (a named defendant and
erroneously sued as UNIVERSAL
8 MUSIC GROUP, INC.)
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION
12
13 GEORGE CLINTON, an individual,
Plaintiff,
14
15
v.
16 WILL ADAMS, p/k/a will.i.am,
individually and d/b/a WILL.I.AM
17 MUSIC PUBLISHING, an individual;
et al.,
18
Defendants.
19
Case No. CV 10-9476 ODW (PLAx)
DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS,
INC.’S JOINDER IN LIST OF
WITNESSES SUBMITTED BY
DEFENDANTS ADAMS, PINEDA,
GOMEZ, FERGUSON, will.i.am
music, inc., AND TAB MAGNETIC,
INC.
Trial Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
June 5, 2012
9:00 a.m.
11
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CALDWELL
LESLIE &
PROCTOR
DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S JOINDER IN LIST OF WITNESSES
1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD:
2
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc., on its
3 own behalf and erroneously sued as Universal Music Group, Inc., hereby joins in the
4 List of Witnesses filed by Defendants William Adams; Stacy Ferguson; Allan
5 Pineda; Jaime Gomez; will.i.am music, inc.; and Tab Magnetic, Inc.
6
7 DATED: April 30, 2012
8
9
10
Respectfully submitted,
CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC
LINDA M. BURROW
ALISON MACKENZIE
11
12
13
14
15
By
/s/ Linda M. Burrow
LINDA M. BURROW
Attorneys for Defendant UMG RECORDINGS,
INC. (both a named defendant and erroneously
sued as UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC.)
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CALDWELL
LESLIE &
PROCTOR
-1-
DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S JOINDER IN LIST OF WITNESSES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?