George Clinton v. Will Adams et al

Filing 101

JOINDER filed by Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc. joining in Witness List 99 . (Burrow, Linda)

Download PDF
1 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC LINDA M. BURROW, State Bar No. 194668 burrow@caldwell-leslie.com 2 ALISON MACKENZIE, State Bar No. 242280 mackenzie@caldwell-leslie.com 3 1000 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 600 4 Los Angeles, California 90017-2463 Telephone: (213) 629-9040 5 Facsimile: (213) 629-9022 6 Attorneys for Defendant UMG RECORDINGS, INC. 7 (a named defendant and erroneously sued as UNIVERSAL 8 MUSIC GROUP, INC.) 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, WESTERN DIVISION 12 13 GEORGE CLINTON, an individual, Plaintiff, 14 15 v. 16 WILL ADAMS, p/k/a will.i.am, individually and d/b/a WILL.I.AM 17 MUSIC PUBLISHING, an individual; et al., 18 Defendants. 19 Case No. CV 10-9476 ODW (PLAx) DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S JOINDER IN LIST OF WITNESSES SUBMITTED BY DEFENDANTS ADAMS, PINEDA, GOMEZ, FERGUSON, will.i.am music, inc., AND TAB MAGNETIC, INC. Trial Date: Time: Courtroom: June 5, 2012 9:00 a.m. 11 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S JOINDER IN LIST OF WITNESSES 1 TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD: 2 PLEASE TAKE NOTICE THAT Defendant UMG Recordings, Inc., on its 3 own behalf and erroneously sued as Universal Music Group, Inc., hereby joins in the 4 List of Witnesses filed by Defendants William Adams; Stacy Ferguson; Allan 5 Pineda; Jaime Gomez; will.i.am music, inc.; and Tab Magnetic, Inc. 6 7 DATED: April 30, 2012 8 9 10 Respectfully submitted, CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR, PC LINDA M. BURROW ALISON MACKENZIE 11 12 13 14 15 By /s/ Linda M. Burrow LINDA M. BURROW Attorneys for Defendant UMG RECORDINGS, INC. (both a named defendant and erroneously sued as UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC.) 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CALDWELL LESLIE & PROCTOR -1- DEFENDANT UMG RECORDINGS, INC.’S JOINDER IN LIST OF WITNESSES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?