George Clinton v. Will Adams et al
Filing
139
Amended NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Creditor Hendricks & Lewis PLLC of Reply of Judgment Lienholder Hendricks & Lewis to Third Party Allan Law Group's Opposition to Proposed Division and Distribution of Settlement Funds under Fed.R.Civ.P. 69(a); Declaration of Katherine Hendricks in support thereof, Exhibit A. (Haas, Mary)
Mary H. Haas (State Bar No. 149770)
maryhaas@dwt.com
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90017-2566
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
GEORGE CLINTON, an individual,
CASE NUMBER:
CV 10-09476 ODW (PLAx)
PLAINTIFF(S)
v.
WILL ADAMS, p/k/a will.i.am, individually, et al.,
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
DEFENDANT(S).
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE:
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.2, the following document(s) or item(s) are exempt from electronic filing,
and will therefore be manually filed (LIST DOCUMENTS):
REPLY OF JUDGMENT LIENHOLDER HENDRICKS & LEWIS TO THIRD PARTY ALLAN LAW GROUP,
P.C.’s OPPOSITION TO PROPOSED DIVISION AND DISTRIBUTION OF SETTLEMENT FUNDS UNDER
FED.R.CIV.P. 69(a); DECLARATION OF KATHERINE HENDRICKS, EXHIBIT A
Document Description:
Administrative Record
✔
Exhibits
Ex Parte Application for authorization of investigative, expert, or other services pursuant to the
Criminal Justice Act [see Local Rule 5.2-2.2(8), Local Criminal Rule 49.1-2(8)]
✔
Other Reply to Opposition Brief, Declaration, and Accompanying Exhibits
Reason:
✔
Under Seal
Items not conducive to e-filing (i.e., videotapes, CDROM, large graphic charts)
Electronic versions are not available to filer
Per Court order dated
Manual Filing required ( reason ):
July 2, 2012
Date
Mary H. Haas
Attorney Name
Hendricks & Lewis PLLC
Party Represented
Note: File one Notice of Manual Filing in each case, each time you manually file document(s).
G-92 (6/12)
NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?