George Clinton v. Will Adams et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Otis D Wright, II: granting 15 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kara E F Cenar on behalf of Defendants, designating Jonathan S. Pink as local counsel. (lt)

Download PDF
George Clinton v. Will Adams et al Doc. 19 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GEORGE CLINTON, an individual, Plaintiff(s) CASE NUMBER 10-cv-09476 ODW (PLAx) v. WILL ADAMS, et al. Defendant(s). ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE The Court, having reviewed the accompanying Application of Kara E. F. Cenar, Applicant's Name of Bryan Cave LLP, 161 N. Clark Street, Suite 4300, Chicago, IL 60601 Firm Name /Address (312) 602-5000 Telephone Number kara.cenar@bryancave.com E-mail Address for permission to appear and participate in the above-entitled action on behalf of Will Adams; Allan Pineda; Jaime Gomez; Stacy Ferguson; Will.I.Am Music, Inc.; Cherry Lane Music Publishing Company, Inc.; Tab Magnetic, Inc.; George Pajon, Jr.; EMI Blackwood Music, Inc. and the designation of Jonathan S. Pink/179685 Local Counsel Designee /State Bar Number Plaintiff Defendant of Bryan Cave LLP, 3161 Michelson Drive, Suite 1500, Irvine, CA 92612-4414 Local Counsel Firm / Address (949) 223-7000 Telephone Number jonathan.pink@bryancave.com E-mail Address as local counsel, hereby ORDERS the Application be: GRANTED DENIED. Fee, if paid, shall be returned by the Clerk. Dated February 24, 2011 /s/ OTIS D. WRIGHT II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE G-64 ORDER (01/08) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com Dockets.Justia.com U. S. District Judge/U.S. Magistrate Judge G-64 ORDER (01/08) ORDER ON APPLICATION OF NON-RESIDENT ATTORNEY TO APPEAR IN A SPECIFIC CASE American LegalNet, Inc. www.FormsWorkflow.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?