George Clinton v. Will Adams et al

Filing 95

ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Otis D Wright, II. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. (cch)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NUMBER: George Clinton, 2:10-cv-09476-ODW -PLA Plaintiff(s) v. Will Adams, et al., ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR Defendant(s). The Court, having considered the parties’ Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby: ORDERS this case referred to: G ADR PROCEDURE NO. 1: (G district judge or G magistrate judge assigned to the case for such settlement proceedings as the judge may conduct or direct). X ADR PROCEDURE NO. 2: This case is referred to the ADR Program. Within twenty- one (21) days, plaintiff shall obtain the consent of a neutral listed on the Court’s Mediation Panel who will conduct the mediation, and file form ADR-2, Stipulation Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator. If the parties have not selected and obtained the consent of a Panel Mediator within twenty-one (21) days, the ADR Program (213-8942993) will assign one. Forms and a list of the Panel Mediators are available on the Court website, www.cacd.uscourts.gov. Absent extraordinary circumstances, parties cannot request a continuance within three (3) business days of a scheduled mediation. G ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation). The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: ______________________________________ The Court further sets a status conference for: ___________________________ For ADR Procedure Nos. 1 and 3, counsel are responsible for contacting the judge or private mediator at the appropriate time to arrange for further proceedings. Dated: April 18, 2012 United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge ADR-12 (01/12) ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?