George Clinton v. Will Adams et al
Filing
95
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Otis D Wright, II. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. (cch)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CASE NUMBER:
George Clinton,
2:10-cv-09476-ODW -PLA
Plaintiff(s)
v.
Will Adams, et al.,
ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR
Defendant(s).
The Court, having considered the parties’ Request: ADR Procedure Selection, the Notice to Parties
of Court-Directed ADR Program, or the report submitted by the parties pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f)
and Civil L.R. 26-1, hereby:
ORDERS this case referred to:
G ADR PROCEDURE NO. 1: (G district judge or G magistrate judge assigned to the case
for such settlement proceedings as the judge may conduct or direct).
X ADR PROCEDURE NO. 2: This case is referred to the ADR Program. Within twenty-
one (21) days, plaintiff shall obtain the consent of a neutral listed on the Court’s
Mediation Panel who will conduct the mediation, and file form ADR-2, Stipulation
Regarding Selection of Panel Mediator. If the parties have not selected and obtained the
consent of a Panel Mediator within twenty-one (21) days, the ADR Program (213-8942993) will assign one. Forms and a list of the Panel Mediators are available on the Court
website, www.cacd.uscourts.gov. Absent extraordinary circumstances, parties cannot
request a continuance within three (3) business days of a scheduled mediation.
G ADR PROCEDURE NO. 3: (Private mediation).
The ADR proceeding is to be completed no later than: ______________________________________
The Court further sets a status conference for: ___________________________
For ADR Procedure Nos. 1 and 3, counsel are responsible for contacting the judge or private
mediator at the appropriate time to arrange for further proceedings.
Dated:
April 18, 2012
United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge
ADR-12 (01/12)
ORDER/REFERRAL TO ADR
Page 1 of 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?