Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton
Filing
306
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENTORDER DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 [305} signed by Judge Otis D. Wright, II.The Assignment Order dated December 5, 2014 is hereby modifiedand amended to provide that the specified assigned accounts are hereby ASSIGNED to Hendricks & Lewis PLLC (SEE DOCUMENT FOR SPECIFIC ACCOUNTS, SPECIFIC NAMED APPLICABLE PARTIES, ROYALTY PAYORS AND DETAILED INSTRUCTIONS THEREIN). (lc)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
KATHERINE HENDRICKS (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
kh@hllaw.com
HENDRICKS & LEWIS PLLC
1516 Federal Ave E
Seattle, Washington 98102-4233
Telephone (206) 624-1933
Facsimile (206) 319-4505
MARY H. HAAS (State Bar No. 149770)
maryhaas@dwt.com
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
865 S. Figueroa Street, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90017-2566
Telephone (213) 633-6800
Facsimile (213) 633-6899
Attorneys for Plaintiff
HENDRICKS & LEWIS PLLC
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
HENDRICKS & LEWIS PLLC, a
Washington professional limited
liability company,
16
Plaintiff,
17
18
vs.
GEORGE CLINTON, an individual,
19
Defendant.
20
21
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV10-09921- ODW (PLAx)
FINDINGS OF FACT AND
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW, AND
ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT
ORDER DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014
The Honorable Otis. D. Wright II
Date:
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Action Filed: August 10, 2010
22
23
24
25
I.
BACKGROUND.
This matter originally came before the Court on Plaintiff and Judgment
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 1
{196659.DOCX }
1
Creditor Hendricks & Lewis PLLC (“H&L”)’s Motion for Assignment Order,
2
3
Restraining Order and Turnover Order filed on December 27, 2010. (See ECF
4
No. 5.) On December 5, 2014, this Court granted H&L’s motion and entered
5
Findings and Conclusions on Motion for Assignment Order, Restraining Order,
6
7
and Document Turnover Order (the “Assignment Order”).
8
9
H&L has moved for a modification of the Assignment Order to extend it to
cover four (4) awards for attorneys’ fees and costs totaling $430,768.35. The
10
11
parties have provided briefing on the subject and the having considered that
12
briefing as well and the entire record of this proceeding, the Court makes the
13
following findings of fact and conclusions of law and Order Extending Assignment
14
15
Order.
16
II.
FINDINGS OF FACT.
17
18
1.
On May 28, 2010, the United States District Court for the Western
19
District of Washington entered judgment in favor of H&L and against Defendant
20
and Judgment Debtor George Clinton for $1,675,639.82 (the “Original
21
22
23
24
Judgment”). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963, H&L registered that judgment in this
District on August 10, 2010.
2.
On December 27, 2010, H&L moved for Assignment Order,
25
26
27
28
Restraining Order and Turnover Order to provide for payment of the Original
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 2
{196659.DOCX }
1
Judgment and costs of the litigation.
2
3
4
5
3.
On December 5, 2014, this Court granted H&L’s motion and entered
Findings and Conclusions on Motion for Assignment Order, Restraining Order,
and Document Turnover Order (the “Assignment Order”). The Assignment Order
6
7
8
9
provided for payment of the Original Judgment, interest and costs of the litigation.
4.
On February 5, 2015, this Court awarded H&L its reasonable
attorney’ fees of $119,666.50 as part of the costs of the assignment motion
10
11
litigation, and on March 17, 2015, taxed costs of $13,611.19. Royalties assigned
12
have been applied to payment of these fees and costs.
13
5.
The balance due on the Original Judgment after application of
14
15
16
payments through October 27, 2016 was $40,216.37.
6.
On September 29, 2016, in Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George
17
18
Clinton, No. 3:13-mc-00183 (M.D. Tenn.), the United States District Court for the
19
Middle District of Tennessee ordered George Clinton to pay H&L reasonable
20
attorneys’ fees in the amount of $146,931.25. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963, H&L
21
22
23
24
registered that Order in this District on November 14, 2016.
7.
On August 28, 2015, in George Clinton v. Will Adams v. Hendricks &
Lewis PLLC, No. 12-56663 (9thCir.), D.C. No. 10-cv-9476-ODW (C.D. Cal.), the
25
26
27
28
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit awarded H&L attorneys’ fees
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 3
{196659.DOCX }
1
and costs against George Clinton in the total amount of $64,540.45.
2
3
4
5
8.
On December 9, 2014, in Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George
Clinton, No. 13-35010 (9th Cir.), D.C. No. 12-CV-841-RSL, the United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its mandate and taxed costs against
6
7
George Clinton in the amount of $892.10. On January 6, 2015, the United States
8
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit amended its mandate by an Order to George
9
Clinton to pay H&L reasonable attorneys’ fees in the amount of $157,618.00.
10
11
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963, H&L registered the Mandate in this District on
12
November 16, 2016, and the Order in this District on November 2, 2015.
13
9.
On July 19, 2010, in Hendricks & Lewis PLLC v. George Clinton, No.
14
15
C10-0253-JCC (W.D. Wash.), the United States District Court for the Western
16
District of Washington entered judgment awarding H&L its reasonable attorneys’
17
18
19
20
fees against George Clinton in the amount of $60,786.50. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1963, H&L registered that Judgment in this District on October 27, 2016.
10.
As a consequence of the foregoing four awards, George Clinton has
21
22
become indebted to Hendricks & Lewis PLLC for a total of $430,768.35 for
23
attorneys’ fees and costs in addition to the original judgment debt he owed
24
Hendricks & Lewis PLLC, the balance of which was $1,304,340.72 at the time the
25
26
27
28
Court entered the assignment order on December 5, 2014.
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 4
{196659.DOCX }
1
11.
Clinton incurred these fees and costs by opposing, obstructing and
2
3
delaying payment of the original judgment debt for which the Assignment Order
4
was entered.
5
12.
George Clinton has given notice to Broadcast Music, Inc. (“BMI”) of
6
7
termination of his songwriter’s performance royalty accounts. Two of the accounts
8
have terminated. The last of these accounts that provides royalties, the Tick Free
9
Music account, reportedly terminates on June 30, 2017.
10
11
12
13.
Clinton reported to this Court that he has moved or is moving his
accounts to a French organization comparable to BMI, Société des Auteurs,
13
Compositeurs et Éditeurs de Musique (Society of Authors, Composers and
14
15
16
Publishers (SACEM)) (ECF 263 at 8.).
14.
At SACEM Clinton’s royalties are beyond the reach of traditional
17
18
19
20
U.S. state garnishment proceedings.
15.
These royalties are now presumptively available to Clinton for his
personal needs and use.
21
22
16.
Under the assignment order entered on December 5, 2014, the original
23
judgment debt and the costs of the Assignment Order litigation have been
24
substantially paid down, and thus, the assigned royalty streams from Universal
25
26
27
28
Music Group (“UMG”) and SoundExchange soon will be available to pay down
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 5
{196659.DOCX }
1
Clinton’s new obligations.
2
3
4
5
17.
H&L currently has two pending judgment enforcement actions outside
this District. One involves an order from the United States District Court for the
Western District of Washington appointing a receiver and directing the licensing
6
7
and/or sale of four copyrights in sound recordings to pay the Original Judgment
8
and the attorneys’ fee judgment entered by that Court. The other involves a
9
garnishment of Clinton’s remaining account at Broadcast Music, Inc. in the United
10
11
States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee to collect the attorneys’
12
fees awarded by that court to H&L from Clinton.
13
18.
All of the payments collected on the judgment to date have been the
14
15
result of H&L’s judgment enforcement actions. Clinton has not made any
16
voluntary payments on the judgment unconnected to H&L’s enforcement efforts
17
18
since the judgment was entered in May 2010. Clinton also has not made any
19
voluntary payments on the awards for attorneys’ fees and costs against him and in
20
favor of H&L.
21
22
23
24
19.
Clinton has not turned over any documentation relating to his royalty
streams as required by the Assignment Order.
20.
Under the Assignment Order, H&L receives royalty payments from
25
26
27
28
third-party royalty payors Universal Music Group (“UMG”) and SoundExchange.
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 6
{196659.DOCX }
1
III.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.
2
3
4
5
1.
H&L has registered each of the out-of-district attorneys’ fee and costs
awards under 28 U.S.C. § 1963, and each of those awards therefore “has the same
effect as a judgment of the district court of the district where registered and may be
6
7
8
9
enforced in like manner.” 28 U.S.C. § 1963.
2.
Under FED. R. CIV. PROC. 69 California law governs this judgment
enforcement proceeding.
10
11
12
13
3.
In California, all property of the judgment debtor is subject to
enforcement of a money judgment absent a statutory exemption. CAL. CIV. CODE
§ 695.010(a); Ford Motor Credit Co.. v. Waters, 166 Cal. App. 4th Supp. 1, 8, 83
14
15
16
Cal. Rptr. 3d 826 (2008).
4.
Under California judgment law, “Either the judgment creditor or the
17
18
judgment debtor may apply to the court on noticed motion for an order to modify .
19
. . the assignment order. CAL. CIV. CODE § 708.560(a). Under CAL. CIV. CODE
20
§ 708.560(b) “The court shall make an order modifying . . . the assignment order
21
22
upon a showing that there has been a material change in circumstances since the
23
time of the previous hearing on the assignment order.” Section 708.560(b) also
24
provides that “The order shall state whether and to what extent it applies to
25
26
27
28
payments already made.”
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 7
{196659.DOCX }
1
5.
The awards of attorneys’ fees and costs against Clinton and in favor of
2
3
H&L constitute a material change in circumstances that have increased Clinton’s
4
total liability to H&L.
5
6.
The substantial pay-down of the balance due on Original Judgment
6
7
debt and the costs of litigation consisting of awards by this Court of attorneys’ fees
8
of $119,666.50 and costs of $13,611.19 constitute a material change in
9
circumstances that will shortly make the assigned royalty streams under the initial
10
11
12
assignment available for payment of the attorneys’ fees and costs awards.
7.
Clinton’s termination of his accounts with Broadcast Music Inc.
13
(“BMI”) to be effective June 30, 2017 and transfer of his performance royalties
14
15
from to Societe des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs de Musique (“SACEM”) in
16
France, beyond the reach of traditional United States garnishment and attachment
17
18
procedures, constitute a material change in circumstances. This will make
19
significant revenue available to Clinton in addition to other royalty payments not
20
assigned to meet Clinton’s reasonable requirements.
21
22
8.
Based on this evidentiary record, H&L has satisfied its burden of
23
demonstrating the propriety of and need for the modification of the assignment
24
order it now seeks as well as an extension of the order restraining Clinton from
25
26
27
28
disposing of or otherwise transferring the royalty streams at issue and requiring
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 8
{196659.DOCX }
1
Clinton to turn over documentation relating to these royalty streams
2
3
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
4
1.
5
H&L’s motion for modification of the assignment order, restraining
order and turnover order is GRANTED.
6
7
8
9
2.
The Assignment Order dated December 5, 2014 is hereby modified
and amended in paragraph 2 on page 14 to provide that the specified assigned
accounts
10
11
are hereby ASSIGNED to Hendricks & Lewis PLLC, c/o Katherine
12
Hendricks, 1516 Federal Avenue East, Seattle, Washington 98102-4233 for
13
purposes of payment of (1) the judgment in the amount of $1,304,340.72,
14
15
plus interest after September 12, 2014, plus other costs as may be allowed,
16
and (2) attorneys’ fees and costs awards totaling $430,768.35. The
17
18
Assignment shall remain in place until such time as the judgment including
19
accrued interest and said attorneys’ fees and costs awards are paid in full, or
20
until this Order is amended.
21
22
23
24
(Emphasis on language added.)
The Assignment Order dated December 5, 2014, is further modified and
amended in paragraph 3 on page 15 of the Assignment Order to provide that the
25
26
27
28
specified accounts
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 9
{196659.DOCX }
1
are hereby ASSIGNED to Hendricks & Lewis PLLC, c/o/ Katherine
2
3
Hendricks, 1516 Federal Avenue East, Seattle, Washington 98102-4233 for
4
purposes of payment of (1) the judgment in the amount of $1,304,340.72,
5
plus interest after September 12, 2014, plus other costs as may be allowed,
6
7
and (2) attorneys’ fees and costs awards totaling $430,768.35. The
8
Assignment shall remain in place until such time as the judgment including
9
accrued interest and said attorneys’ fees and costs awards are paid in full, or
10
11
12
until this Order is amended.
(Emphasis on language added.)
13
3.
IT IS ORDERED that pursuant to CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE § 708.510,
14
15
all accounts, accounts receivable, rights to payment of money, contract rights,
16
rights to payment of money from third parties, contingent rights, deposits and
17
18
19
deposit accounts, claims against third parties and monies due from the following
third parties (referred to collectively hereinafter as “Royalty Payors”):
20
a.
UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., UMG RECORDINGS,
21
INC., and all affiliated labels, 2220 Colorado Avenue, Santa
22
23
Monica, California 90404, and 1755 Broadway, New York,
24
New York 10019, specifically the following accounts:
25
Account No.
26
27
28
Account Name
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 10
{196659.DOCX }
1
Account No.
2
Account Name
XXXX3068
Tick Free Music Inc.
XXXX4652
7
Tick Free Music
XXXX0297
6
Parliament
XXXXP730
5
Clinton George-Paythrough Acc
XXXX6304
4
Clinton George/Clijo Prod-310
XXXX5301
3
Tick Free Music
8
b.
9
10
CAPITOL RECORDS, EMI MUSIC, EMI MUSIC NORTH
AMERICA, and all affiliated labels, 1750 Vine Street,
11
Hollywood, California 90028, specifically the following
12
accounts:
13
14
Account No.
15
Account Name
XXXX7/002
Red Hot Chili/George Clinton – 7137455
XXXX8/001
Clinton, George/Clijo Prod – 3101687
17
XXXX38/002
Clinton, Ge/Gregory Paul Prod – 3101689
18
XXXX38/003
Clinton, George/Scoop of Poop – 3101690
19
XXXX38/007
XXXX38/008
Clinton, George/Clijo Prod –
3601687/3651687
Clinton, George-Paythrough Acct – G.H.
XXXX98/001
Clinton, G/Scoop of Poop Prod - 3101691
16
20
21
22
c.
23
24
SOUNDEXCHANGE, 733 10th Street NW, 10th Floor,
Washington D.C. 20001, specifically account for What
25
Productions and/or The C Kunspyruhzy F/S/O George Clinton.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 11
{196659.DOCX }
1
and in favor of and for the benefit of Defendant and Judgment Debtor George
2
3
Clinton, or any of Defendant’s assignees, other persons acting on his behalf, and
4
any of the following Clinton entities:
5
d.
P-Funk, Inc.;
7
e.
Clijo Productions, Inc.;
8
f.
Disc and Dat, Inc. I;
g.
Disc and Dat, Inc. II;
11
h.
What Production Company, Inc.;
12
i.
Tick Free Music Publishing, Inc.;
j.
The Dog In Me, Inc.;
15
k.
The C Kunspyruhzy, LLC;
16
l.
PFunk Nation Celebration, Inc.;
m.
Egmitt Productions, Inc.;
19
n.
A Scoop of Poop Productions, Inc.; and
20
o.
Exoskeletol Music
6
9
10
13
14
17
18
21
22
are hereby ASSIGNED to Hendricks & Lewis PLLC, c/o Katherine Hendricks,
23
1516 Federal Ave E, Seattle, Washington 98102-4233, for purposes of payment of
24
(1) the judgment in the amount of $1,304,340.72, plus interest after September 12,
25
26
27
28
2014, plus other costs as may be allowed; and (2) attorneys’ fees and costs award
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 12
{196659.DOCX }
1
totaling $430,768.35. The Assignment shall remain in place until such time as the
2
3
judgment is paid in full, including accrued interest, and the said attorneys’ fees and
4
costs are paid in full, or until this Order is amended.
5
4.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE
6
7
§ 708.510, all accounts, accounts receivable, rights to payment of money, contract
8
rights, rights to payment of money from third parties, contingent rights, deposits
9
and deposit accounts, claims against third parties and monies due Clinton from the
10
11
following Clinton entities:
12
a.
P-Funk, Inc.;
b.
Clijo Productions, Inc.;
15
c.
Disc and Dat, Inc. I;
16
d.
Disc and Dat, Inc. II;
e.
What Production Company, Inc.;
19
f.
Tick Free Music Publishing, Inc.;
20
g.
The Dog In Me, Inc.;
h.
The C Kunspyruhzy, LLC;
23
i.
PFunk Nation Celebration, Inc.;
24
j.
Egmitt Productions, Inc.;
k.
A Scoop of Poop Productions, Inc.; and
13
14
17
18
21
22
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 13
{196659.DOCX }
1
l.
Exoskeletol Music
2
3
and in favor of and for the benefit of Defendant and Judgment Debtor George
4
Clinton, or any of Defendant’s assignees or other persons acting on his behalf, are
5
hereby ASSIGNED to Hendricks & Lewis PLLC, such that payments due from
6
7
any of the Royalty Payors to any Clinton entity identified above may be paid
8
directly to Plaintiff and Judgment Creditor Hendricks & Lewis PLLC, c/o
9
Katherine Hendricks, 1516 Federal Ave E, Seattle, Washington 98102-4233, for
10
11
purposes of payment of (1) the judgment in the amount of $1,304,340.72, plus
12
interest after September 12, 2014, plus other costs as may be allowed; and
13
(2) attorneys’ fees and costs awards totaling $430,768.35. The Assignment shall
14
15
remain in place until such time as the judgment is paid in full, including accrued
16
interest, and said attorneys’ fees and costs awards are paid in full, or until this
17
18
19
20
Order is amended.
5.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE
§ 708.520, Clinton, his agents, employees, attorneys, accountants, and other
21
22
representatives, and any and all person(s) acting in concert or participating with
23
any of them, are hereby stayed, prohibited, and enjoined from cashing, negotiating,
24
advancing, collecting, assigning or encumbering any and all accounts, accounts
25
26
27
28
receivable, rights to payment of money, claims for payment of money due from
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 14
{196659.DOCX }
1
third parties, or other rights subject to the assignment herein.
2
3
4
5
6.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to CAL. CIV. PROC. CODE
§ 699.040, Clinton shall deliver all checks, cash, notes, instruments, deposits,
deposit accounts, drafts, accounts receivable ledgers or journals, or any other
6
7
tangible item of payment received by Clinton or his agents, employees, attorneys,
8
accountants, and other representatives pertaining to the rights to payment subject to
9
the assignment herein to the Marshal, Central District of California, 255 E. Temple
10
11
12
Street, Room 346, Third Floor, Los Angeles, California 90012-4798.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
13
Date: January 25, 2017
14
15
16
________________________________
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS,
AND ORDER MODIFYING ASSIGNMENT ORDER
DATED DECEMBER 5, 2014 - 15
{196659.DOCX }
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?