Walter David Gray v. M Taber et al

Filing 79

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/20/2012. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to apprise the Court of his current address, the Court will issue a Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge recommending the action be dismissed with prejudice. (rh)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA WESTERN DIVISION 7 8 9 10 11 WALTER DAVID GRAY, 12 13 14 15 Plaintiff, v. M. TABER, et al., Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-00190-VAP (VBK) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL 16 17 On January 18, 2011, Walter David Gray (hereinafter referred 18 to as “Plaintiff”) filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. §1983 against Defendants M. Taber, S. Lopez, Joseph Branch 20 and Andrick Elmore. 21 On May 17, 2012, a Report and Recommendation of United 22 States Magistrate Judge was issued granting Defendants’ Motion to 23 Dismiss on the grounds that Plaintiff had not fully exhausted his 24 administrative remedies; Plaintiff’s claims of constitutional 25 violations based on his arrest and incarceration were barred by 26 the favorable termination rule; Plaintiff’s supervisory claim was 27 vague and conclusory; and Plaintiff failed to state an excessive 28 force claim. (Docket No. 76.) 1 1 The Court docket lists Plaintiff’s address as CIM RCE Palm 2 Hall West - ADA Cell 121, P. O. Box 441, Chino, California 91708. 3 On May 25, 2012, the Court was informed that Plaintiff is no 4 longer in custody. (See, “Return to Sender - Inmate Paroled,” 5 Docket Nos. 77 and 78.) 6 Central District Local Rule 41-6 provides: 7 “DISMISSAL - FAILURE OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF TO KEEP COURT 8 APPRISED OF CURRENT ADDRESS - A party appearing pro se 9 shall keep the Court apprised of such party’s current 10 address 11 address, if any. 12 pro 13 undelivered by the Post Office, and if within fifteen 14 (15) days of the service date, such Plaintiff fails to 15 notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of 16 said Plaintiff’s current address, the Court may dismiss 17 the 18 prosecution.” se and telephone with if any, and e-mail If mail directed by the Clerk to a Plaintiff’s action number, or address without of record prejudice is for returned want of 19 20 Within 15 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff will 21 notify the Court of his current address, and, if applicable, 22 telephone number. 23 apprise the Court of his current address, the Court will issue a 24 Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge 25 recommending the action be dismissed with prejudice. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to 26 27 28 DATED: June 4, 2012 /s/ VICTOR B. KENTON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?