Walter David Gray v. M Taber et al
Filing
79
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Magistrate Judge Victor B. Kenton Response to Order to Show Cause due by 6/20/2012. Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to apprise the Court of his current address, the Court will issue a Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge recommending the action be dismissed with prejudice. (rh)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WESTERN DIVISION
7
8
9
10
11
WALTER DAVID GRAY,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
M. TABER, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV 11-00190-VAP (VBK)
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE
DISMISSAL
16
17
On January 18, 2011, Walter David Gray (hereinafter referred
18
to as “Plaintiff”) filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42
19
U.S.C. §1983 against Defendants M. Taber, S. Lopez, Joseph Branch
20
and Andrick Elmore.
21
On May 17, 2012, a Report and Recommendation of United
22
States Magistrate Judge was issued granting Defendants’ Motion to
23
Dismiss on the grounds that Plaintiff had not fully exhausted his
24
administrative remedies; Plaintiff’s claims of constitutional
25
violations based on his arrest and incarceration were barred by
26
the favorable termination rule; Plaintiff’s supervisory claim was
27
vague and conclusory; and Plaintiff failed to state an excessive
28
force claim. (Docket No. 76.)
1
1
The Court docket lists Plaintiff’s address as CIM RCE Palm
2
Hall West - ADA Cell 121, P. O. Box 441, Chino, California 91708.
3
On May 25, 2012, the Court was informed that Plaintiff is no
4
longer in custody. (See, “Return to Sender - Inmate Paroled,”
5
Docket Nos. 77 and 78.)
6
Central District Local Rule 41-6 provides:
7
“DISMISSAL - FAILURE OF PRO SE PLAINTIFF TO KEEP COURT
8
APPRISED OF CURRENT ADDRESS - A party appearing pro se
9
shall keep the Court apprised of such party’s current
10
address
11
address, if any.
12
pro
13
undelivered by the Post Office, and if within fifteen
14
(15) days of the service date, such Plaintiff fails to
15
notify, in writing, the Court and opposing parties of
16
said Plaintiff’s current address, the Court may dismiss
17
the
18
prosecution.”
se
and
telephone
with
if
any,
and
e-mail
If mail directed by the Clerk to a
Plaintiff’s
action
number,
or
address
without
of
record
prejudice
is
for
returned
want
of
19
20
Within 15 days of the date of this Order, Plaintiff will
21
notify the Court of his current address, and, if applicable,
22
telephone number.
23
apprise the Court of his current address, the Court will issue a
24
Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
25
recommending the action be dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff is advised that if he fails to
26
27
28
DATED: June 4, 2012
/s/
VICTOR B. KENTON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?