Faine Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al

Filing 29

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 28 , the action is hereby dismissed, in its entirety, without prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (S.B. # 220972) Hannah R. Salassi, Esq. (S.B. #230117) SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 891-9800 Facsimile: (510) 891-7030 E-mail: mbainer@scalaw.com E-mail: hsalassi@scalaw.com Web: www.scalaw.com JS-6 Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff and the Plaintiff Class 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 ATTORNEY’S AT LAW THE WACHOVIA TOWER 1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR OAKLAND, CA 94612 TEL: (510) 891-9800 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 11 FAINE DAVIS, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 14 Plaintiffs, vs. 15 16 NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 18 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 11-609 PA CLASS ACTION U U U ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE ORDER 1 U 2 3 Pursuant to stipulation by the parties and good cause appearing, the action 4 entitled Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc. (Case No. CV 11-609) is hereby dismissed, in its 5 entirety, without prejudice. 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: April _13__, 2011 U U The Hon. Percy Anderson United States District Judge 10 12 ATTORNEY’S AT LAW THE WACHOVIA TOWER 1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR OAKLAND, CA 94612 TEL: (510) 891-9800 SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC 11 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?