Faine Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc. et al
Filing
29
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Percy Anderson: Upon Stipulation 28 , the action is hereby dismissed, in its entirety, without prejudice. ( Case Terminated. Made JS-6. ) (gk)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Matthew R. Bainer, Esq. (S.B. # 220972)
Hannah R. Salassi, Esq. (S.B. #230117)
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
1970 Broadway, Ninth Floor
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 891-9800
Facsimile: (510) 891-7030
E-mail: mbainer@scalaw.com
E-mail: hsalassi@scalaw.com
Web: www.scalaw.com
JS-6
Attorneys for the Representative Plaintiff
and the Plaintiff Class
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
ATTORNEY’S AT LAW
THE WACHOVIA TOWER
1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TEL: (510) 891-9800
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
11
FAINE DAVIS, individually, and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
13
14
Plaintiffs,
vs.
15
16
NORDSTROM, INC., and DOES 1
through 50, inclusive,
17
18
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. CV 11-609 PA
CLASS ACTION
U
U
U
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
ORDER
1
U
2
3
Pursuant to stipulation by the parties and good cause appearing, the action
4
entitled Davis v. Nordstrom, Inc. (Case No. CV 11-609) is hereby dismissed, in its
5
entirety, without prejudice.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
8
9
Dated: April _13__, 2011
U
U
The Hon. Percy Anderson
United States District Judge
10
12
ATTORNEY’S AT LAW
THE WACHOVIA TOWER
1970 BROADWAY, NINTH FLOOR
OAKLAND, CA 94612
TEL: (510) 891-9800
SCOTT COLE & ASSOCIATES, APC
11
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?