MGA Entertainment Inc v. Mattel Inc et al

Filing 35

ORDER by Judge David O. Carter, GRANTING Stipulation to Extend Page Limit and Set Briefing Schedule re: Mattel, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss 34 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: (1) Mattels motion to dismiss and MGAs response thereto shall be no longer than 35 pages in length; (2) Mattels motion to dismiss shall be filed by December 9, 2011; (3) MGAs response to Mattels motion to dismiss shall be filed by January 17, 2012; (see document for further details.) (rla)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP
John B. Quinn (Bar No. 090378)
2
([e-mail])
NOTE: CHANGES MADE BY THE COURT
Michael T. Zeller (Bar No. 196417)
3
([e-mail])
865 South Figueroa Street, 10th Floor
4
Los Angeles, California 90017-2543
5 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
6
Attorneys for Mattel, Inc. and Robert A.
7 Eckert
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SOUTHERN DIVISION

11 MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a
California corporation,
12
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
MATTEL, INC., a Delaware
15 corporation, and ROBERT A.
ECKERT
16
Defendants.
17

CASE NO. CV 11-1063 DOC (RNBx)

Hon. David O. Carter
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
TO EXTEND PAGE LIMIT AND SET
BRIEFING SCHEDULE RE: MATTEL,
INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00505.07975/4449766.1

Case No. CV 11-01063 DOC (RNBx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION

ORDER

1
2

Based on the concurrently filed Stipulation to Extend Page Limit and

3 Set Briefing Schedule Re: Mattel, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss,
4

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

5

(1) Mattel’s motion to dismiss and MGA’s response thereto shall be no

6 longer than 35 pages in length;
7

(2) Mattel’s motion to dismiss shall be filed by December 9, 2011;

8

(3) MGA’s response to Mattel’s motion to dismiss shall be filed by

9 January 17, 2012;
10

(4) Mattel’s reply shall be filed by January 30, 2012;

11

(5) the hearing date shall be scheduled for February 13, 2012; and

12

(6) Mattel’s time to answer the First Amended Complaint shall be

13 tolled pending the resolution of Mattel’s contemplated motion to dismiss pursuant to
14 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(a)(4)(A).
15
16
17
18

DATED: November 18, 2011

__________________________________
Hon. David O. Carter
United States District Judge

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
00505.07975/4449766.1

-2-

Case No. CV 11-01063 DOC (RNBx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER RE: STIPULATION