Kevin Dwaine Mitchell et al v. Acosta Sales, LLC et al

Filing 230

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Gary A. Feess: re: Request for Clarification 228 . The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs' September 24, 2013, request for clarification regarding the Court's Order of September 10, 2013, granting final a pproval of the class action settlement in this case. Plaintiffs request clarification regarding the service awards for named Plaintiffs Lytle, Sutton, Johnson, and Puliselich. Pursuant to the Courts Order of September 10, 2013, the Court awards Lytle, Sutton, Johnson, and Puliselich $2,500 in enhancement pay. The Courts final order will be amended to eliminate the inconsistency. (smo)

Download PDF
LINK: 228 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case No. CV 11-01796 GAF (OPx) Title Kevin Dwaine Mitchell et al v. Acosta Sales, LLC et al Present: The Honorable Date September 27, 2013 GARY ALLEN FEESS Stephen Montes Kerr Deputy Clerk None Court Reporter / Recorder N/A Tape No. Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants: None None Proceedings: (In Chambers) ORDER RE: REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION The Court is in receipt of Plaintiffs’ September 24, 2013, request for clarification regarding the Court’s Order of September 10, 2013, granting final approval of the class action settlement in this case. Plaintiffs request clarification regarding the service awards for named Plaintiffs Lytle, Sutton, Johnson, and Puliselich. Pursuant to the Court’s Order of September 10, 2013, the Court awards Lytle, Sutton, Johnson, and Puliselich $2,500 in enhancement pay. The Court’s final order will be amended to eliminate the inconsistency. IT IS SO ORDERED. CV-90 (06/04) CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Page 1 of 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?