JibJab Media Inc v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc et al

Filing 38

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OFCIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) by Judge Manuel L. Real, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rs)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 Stephen G. Contopulos (SBN 50317) scontopulos@sidley.com Bradley H. Ellis (SBN 110467) bellis@sidley.com Carly A. Steinbaum (SBN 260726) csteinbaum@sidley.com SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP 555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000 Los Angeles, California 90013 Telephone: (213) 896-6000 Facsimile: (213) 896-6600 J S -6 Attorneys for Defendants Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.; Northern California Toyota Dealers Advertising Association; and Hoffman/Lewis UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JIBJAB MEDIA, INC., a Delaware corporation, ) Case No. CV 11-01853 R (RZx) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE vs. ) PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF ) CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A., ) INC., a California corporation; ) NORTHERN CALIFORNIA TOYOTA ) DEALERS ADVERTISING ) ASSOCIATION, a California ) Corporation; HOFFMAN/LEWIS, an ) unknown business entity, and DOES ) 1-10, inclusive, ) ) Defendants. ) ) 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA1 2391858v.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE 1 ORDER 2 3 4 5 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR: 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action shall be and 8 hereby is dismissed as to all Defendants with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of 9 the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party bearing its own costs and 10 attorneys’ fees. The Court shall and hereby does retain jurisdiction to enforce the 11 parties’ settlement agreement. 12 13 14 15 Dated: February 27, 2012 _____________________________________ The Honorable Manuel Real 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LA1 2391858v.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?