JibJab Media Inc v. Toyota Motor Sales USA Inc et al
Filing
38
ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE ACTION WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OFCIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1) by Judge Manuel L. Real, Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rs)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Stephen G. Contopulos (SBN 50317)
scontopulos@sidley.com
Bradley H. Ellis (SBN 110467)
bellis@sidley.com
Carly A. Steinbaum (SBN 260726)
csteinbaum@sidley.com
SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP
555 West Fifth Street, Suite 4000
Los Angeles, California 90013
Telephone: (213) 896-6000
Facsimile: (213) 896-6600
J S -6
Attorneys for Defendants
Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A, Inc.;
Northern California Toyota Dealers Advertising
Association; and Hoffman/Lewis
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JIBJAB MEDIA, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
) Case No. CV 11-01853 R (RZx)
)
)
Plaintiff,
) ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE
) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
vs.
) PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF
) CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)
TOYOTA MOTOR SALES, U.S.A.,
)
INC., a California corporation;
)
NORTHERN CALIFORNIA TOYOTA )
DEALERS ADVERTISING
)
ASSOCIATION, a California
)
Corporation; HOFFMAN/LEWIS, an
)
unknown business entity, and DOES
)
1-10, inclusive,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA1 2391858v.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
1
ORDER
2
3
4
5
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation AND GOOD CAUSE APPEARING
THEREFOR:
6
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned action shall be and
8
hereby is dismissed as to all Defendants with prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of
9
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with each party bearing its own costs and
10
attorneys’ fees. The Court shall and hereby does retain jurisdiction to enforce the
11
parties’ settlement agreement.
12
13
14
15
Dated: February 27, 2012
_____________________________________
The Honorable Manuel Real
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LA1 2391858v.1
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITH PREJUDICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?