Camelot Distribution Group, Inc. v. Does

Filing 10

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY by Magistrate Judge Fernando M. Olguin: IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery (Document No. 5 ) is denied without prejudice. (mr)

Download PDF
Camelot Distribution Group, Inc. v. Does Doc. 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Having reviewed plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery ("Motion"), the court finds that the Motion is deficient because it does not clearly set forth each Internet Service Provider ("ISP") for which plaintiff requests authorization to serve subpoenas. Although plaintiff included a chart of the defendant Does' Internet Protocol ("IP") addresses and a column for the ISPs that correspond to the IP addresses, many of the ISP names are cut-off. (See Motion, Declaration of Scott M. Plamondon, Exh. B). Plaintiff must clearly identify each ISP so that each may be given proper notice. In addition, plaintiff must establish why discovery is needed from each ISP. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Discovery (Document No. 5) is denied without prejudice. Dated this 16th day of March, 2011. /s/ Fernando M. Olguin United States Magistrate Judge DOES, Defendants. v. Plaintiff, CAMELOT DISTRIBUTION GROUP, INC., ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. CV 11-1949 DDP (FMOx) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?