Securities and Exchange Commission v. Spyglass Equity Systems Inc et al
Filing
72
FINAL JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants Spyglass, Carter, Sjoblom, Elliot, and their agents, servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them wh o receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 19(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act")[15 U.S .C.78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder [17C.F.R.240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any security, (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (bp)
JS-6
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
v.
CASE No: 2:11-cv-02371-JAK-MAN
5
6
7
8
9
10
FINAL JUDGMENT
SPYGLASS EQUITY SYSTEMS, INC.,
RICHARD L. CARTER,
PRESTON L. SJOBLOM,
TYSON D. ELLIOTT,
FLATIRON CAPITAL PARTNERS, LLC,
FLATIRON SYSTEMS, LLC, AND
DAVID E. HOWARD II,
Defendants.
The Securities and Exchange Commission having filed a Complaint
11
and Defendants Spyglass Equity Systems, Inc. (“Spyglass”), Richard L.
12
Carter, Preston L. Sjoblom, and Tyson D. Elliott having entered general
13
appearances; consented to the Court’s jurisdiction over them and the
14
subject matter of this action; consented to entry of this Final Judgment
15
without admitting or denying the allegations of the Complaint (except as to
16
jurisdiction); waived findings of fact and conclusions of law; and waived any
17
right to appeal from this Final Judgment:
18
I.
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
20
Defendants Spyglass, Carter, Sjoblom, Elliott, and their agents, servants,
Page 1
1
employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with
2
them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by personal service
3
or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined from violating,
4
directly or indirectly, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
5
(the "Exchange Act") [15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)] and Rule 10b-5 promulgated
6
thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5], by using any means or instrumentality
7
of interstate commerce, or of the mails, or of any facility of any national
8
securities exchange, in connection with the purchase or sale of any
9
security:
10
(a)
to employ any device, scheme, or artifice to defraud;
11
(b)
to make any untrue statement of a material fact or to omit to
12
state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
13
made, in the light of the circumstances under which they were made,
14
not misleading; or
15
(c)
16
operates or would operate as a fraud or deceit upon any person.
17
II.
18
to engage in any act, practice, or course of business which
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
19
that Defendants Spyglass, Carter, Sjoblom, Elliott, and their agents,
20
servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or
Page 2
1
participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by
2
personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined
3
from violating, directly or indirectly, Section 15(a) of the Exchange Act [15
4
U.S.C. § 78o(a)] by making use of the means or instruments of interstate
5
commerce to induce or attempt to induce the purchase or sale of a security
6
while not registered as or associated with a broker or dealer.
7
8
III.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
9
that Defendants Spyglass, Carter, Sjoblom, Elliott, and their agents,
10
servants, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or
11
participation with them who receive actual notice of this Final Judgment by
12
personal service or otherwise are permanently restrained and enjoined
13
from aiding and abetting any violation of Section 206(4) of the Investment
14
Advisers Act (“Advisers Act”) [15 U.S.C. § 80b-6(4)] or Rule 206(4)-8
15
promulgated thereunder [17 C.F.R. § 275.206(4)-8] by knowingly providing
16
substantial assistance to an investment adviser engaged in acts, practices,
17
or courses of business which are fraudulent, deceptive or manipulative.
18
19
20
IV.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
that Defendant Spyglass is liable for disgorgement of $1,130,000
Page 3
1
representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the
2
Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of
3
$134,799, for a total of $1,264,799. The Commission may enforce the
4
Court’s judgment for disgorgement and prejudgment interest by moving for
5
civil contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by
6
law) at any time after 14 days following entry of this Final Judgment. In
7
response to any such civil contempt motion by the Commission, the
8
defendant may assert any legally permissible defense.
9
10
V.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
11
that Defendant Carter is liable for disgorgement of $139,260 representing
12
profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together
13
with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $16,612 for a total of
14
$155,872. Based on Defendant’s sworn representations in his Statement
15
of Financial Condition dated January 17, 2012 and other documents and
16
information submitted to the Commission, however, the Court is not
17
ordering Defendant to pay a civil penalty and payment of the disgorgement
18
and pre-judgment interest thereon is waived.
19
20
Page 4
1
VI.
2
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
3
that Defendant Sjoblom is liable for disgorgement of $208,916 representing
4
profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together
5
with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $24,291, for a total of
6
$233,207. Based on Defendant’s sworn representations in his Statement
7
of Financial Condition dated January 17, 2012 and other documents and
8
information submitted to the Commission, however, the Court is not
9
ordering Defendant to pay a civil penalty and payment of the disgorgement
10
and pre-judgment interest thereon is waived.
11
VII.
12
The determination not to impose a civil penalty upon Defendants
13
Carter and Sjoblom and to waive payment of the disgorgement and pre-
14
judgment interest for which they are liable is contingent upon the accuracy
15
and completeness of Defendants’ Statements of Financial Condition. If at
16
any time following the entry of this Final Judgment the Commission obtains
17
information indicating that Defendants’ representations to the Commission
18
concerning their assets, income, liabilities, or net worth were fraudulent,
19
misleading, inaccurate, or incomplete in any material respect as of the time
20
such representations were made, the Commission may, at its sole
Page 5
1
discretion and without prior notice to the Defendant, petition the Court for
2
an order requiring the Defendant to pay the unpaid portion of the
3
disgorgement, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest thereon, and the
4
maximum civil penalty allowable under the law. In connection with any
5
such petition, the only issue shall be whether the financial information
6
provided by the Defendant was fraudulent, misleading, inaccurate, or
7
incomplete in any material respect as of the time such representations
8
were made. In its petition, the Commission may move this Court to
9
consider all available remedies, including, but not limited to, ordering the
10
Defendant to pay funds or assets, directing the forfeiture of any assets, or
11
sanctions for contempt of this Final Judgment. The Commission may also
12
request additional discovery. The Defendant may not, by way of defense to
13
such petition: (1) challenge the validity of the Consent or this Final
14
Judgment; (2) contest the allegations in the Complaint filed by the
15
Commission; (3) assert that payment of disgorgement, pre-judgment and
16
post-judgment interest or a civil penalty should not be ordered; (4) contest
17
the amount of disgorgement and pre-judgment and post-judgment interest;
18
(5) contest the imposition of the maximum civil penalty allowable under the
19
law; or (6) assert any defense to liability or remedy, including, but not
20
limited to, any statute of limitations defense.
Page 6
1
2
VIII.
IT IS HEREBY FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED
3
that Defendant Elliott is liable for disgorgement of $170,988 representing
4
profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together
5
with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $21,360, for a total of
6
$192,348 and a civil penalty in the amount of $130,000 pursuant to 15
7
U.S.C. § 78u(d). The Commission may enforce the Court’s judgment for
8
disgorgement, prejudgment interest, and a civil penalty by moving for civil
9
contempt (and/or through other collection procedures authorized by law) at
10
any time after 14 days following entry of this Final Judgment. In response
11
to any such civil contempt motion by the Commission, the defendant may
12
assert any legally permissible defense.
13
IX.
14
Defendants may transmit payments electronically to the Commission,
15
which will provide detailed ACH transfer/Fedwire instructions upon request.
16
Payment may also be made directly from a bank account via Pay.gov
17
through the SEC website at http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/ofm.htm.
18
Defendants may also pay by certified check, bank cashier’s check, or
19
United States postal money order payable to the Securities and Exchange
20
Commission, which shall be delivered or mailed to
Page 7
1
Enterprise Services Center
2
Accounts Receivable Branch
6500 South MacArthur Boulevard
3
Oklahoma City, OK 73169
4
and shall be accompanied by a letter identifying the case title, civil action
5
number, and name of this Court; the Defendant’s name; and specifying that
6
payment is made pursuant to this Final Judgment.
7
Defendant shall simultaneously transmit photocopies of evidence of
8
payment and case identifying information to the Commission’s counsel in
9
this action. By making any payment, Defendant relinquishes all legal and
10
equitable right, title, and interest in such funds and no part of the funds
11
shall be returned to Defendant. The Commission shall send the funds paid
12
pursuant to this Final Judgment to the United States Treasury.
13
Defendants shall pay post judgment interest on any delinquent
14
amounts pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.
15
X.
16
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that
17
Defendants’ Consents are incorporated herein with the same force and
18
effect as if fully set forth herein, and that Defendants shall comply with all of
19
the undertakings and agreements set forth therein.
20
Page 8
1
2
XI.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this
3
Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the
4
terms of this Judgment.
5
6
XII.
There being no just reason for delay, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the
7
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Clerk is ordered to enter this
8
Judgment forthwith and without further notice.
9
10
11
12
July 27, 2012
Dated: ___________________
________________________________
JOHN A. KRONSTADT
United States District Judge
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
Page 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?