Kaneka Corporation v. Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. et al

Filing 846

STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT BY KANEKA CORPORATION 842 by Judge S. James Otero: 1. Final Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 is entered against Kaneka and for declaratory judgment Defendants Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company and Pacific Rainbow International, Inc. ; and2. All other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters which have been asserted (except for any claim(s) or motion(s) relating to an exceptional case determination pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or other bases for the award of attorneys fees and/or costs, the timing of which is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and (2), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(e)) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)

Download PDF
JS-6 1 2 April 20,2018 3 VC P 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 KANEKA CORPORATION, a Japanese corporation, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 XIAMEN KINGDOMWAY GROUP COMPANY, a Chinese corporation, PACIFIC RAINBOW INTERNATIONAL INC., a California Corporation, SHENZHOU BIOLOGY & TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Chinese corporation, SOJITZ CORPORATION OF AMERICA, a New York corporation, and ROCHEM INTERNATIONAL, INC., a New York corporation, 14 15 16 17 CASE NO.: 11-cv-02389 SJO (SSx) Hon. S. James Otero STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT BY KANEKA CORPORATION Pretrial Conference: April 12, 2018 Time: 9:00am Trial Date: April 17, 2018 Courtroom: 10C 18 Defendants. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 1474755 FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 1 2 Before the Court is the Stipulation For Entry Of Final Judgment Of Non- 3 Infringement filed by Plaintiff Kaneka Corporation (“Kaneka”). Based on Kaneka’s 4 stipulation, and good cause appearing, Kaneka’s stipulation is APPROVED and SO 5 ORDERED. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND 6 DECREED THAT: 7 1. Final Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 is 8 entered against Kaneka and for declaratory judgment Defendants Xiamen 9 Kingdomway Group Company (“Kingdomway”) and Pacific Rainbow International, 10 11 Inc. (“Pacific Rainbow”); and 2. All other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters which have 12 been asserted (except for any claim(s) or motion(s) relating to an “exceptional case” 13 determination pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or other bases for the award of attorneys’ 14 fees and/or costs, the timing of which is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and (2), 15 and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(e)) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 16 17 18 19 20 April 20, 2018 DATED: By: Hon. S. James Otero United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 1474755 1 2 FILER’S ATTESTATION Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2), the filer hereby attests that all other 3 signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s 4 content and have authorized the filing. 5 6 /s/ Rex Hwang Rex Hwang 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT 1474755

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?