Kaneka Corporation v. Zhejiang Medicine Co., Ltd. et al
Filing
846
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT BY KANEKA CORPORATION 842 by Judge S. James Otero: 1. Final Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 is entered against Kaneka and for declaratory judgment Defendants Xiamen Kingdomway Group Company and Pacific Rainbow International, Inc. ; and2. All other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters which have been asserted (except for any claim(s) or motion(s) relating to an exceptional case determination pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or other bases for the award of attorneys fees and/or costs, the timing of which is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and (2), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(e)) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lc)
JS-6
1
2
April 20,2018
3
VC
P
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
KANEKA CORPORATION, a Japanese
corporation,
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
XIAMEN KINGDOMWAY GROUP
COMPANY, a Chinese corporation,
PACIFIC RAINBOW
INTERNATIONAL INC., a California
Corporation, SHENZHOU BIOLOGY &
TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., a Chinese
corporation, SOJITZ CORPORATION
OF AMERICA, a New York corporation,
and ROCHEM INTERNATIONAL,
INC., a New York corporation,
14
15
16
17
CASE NO.: 11-cv-02389 SJO (SSx)
Hon. S. James Otero
STIPULATED FINAL
JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT BY KANEKA
CORPORATION
Pretrial Conference: April 12, 2018
Time:
9:00am
Trial Date:
April 17, 2018
Courtroom:
10C
18
Defendants.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
1474755
FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
1
2
Before the Court is the Stipulation For Entry Of Final Judgment Of Non-
3
Infringement filed by Plaintiff Kaneka Corporation (“Kaneka”). Based on Kaneka’s
4
stipulation, and good cause appearing, Kaneka’s stipulation is APPROVED and SO
5
ORDERED. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
6
DECREED THAT:
7
1.
Final Judgment of Non-Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 7,910,340 is
8
entered against Kaneka and for declaratory judgment Defendants Xiamen
9
Kingdomway Group Company (“Kingdomway”) and Pacific Rainbow International,
10
11
Inc. (“Pacific Rainbow”); and
2.
All other claims, counterclaims, defenses, or other matters which have
12
been asserted (except for any claim(s) or motion(s) relating to an “exceptional case”
13
determination pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 285 or other bases for the award of attorneys’
14
fees and/or costs, the timing of which is governed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and (2),
15
and Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(e)) are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
16
17
18
19
20
April 20, 2018
DATED:
By:
Hon. S. James Otero
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
1474755
1
2
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-4.3.4(a)(2), the filer hereby attests that all other
3
signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s
4
content and have authorized the filing.
5
6
/s/ Rex Hwang
Rex Hwang
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATED FINAL JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT
1474755
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?