James Snee v. The Zurich Services Corporation et al

Filing 18

PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian re Stipulation for Protective Order 17 . See order for details. (hr)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
Raymond R. Kepner (SBN 90093)
[e-mail]
Candace S. Bertoldi (SBN 254725)
[e-mail]
333 South Hope Street, Suite 3900
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1406
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
THE ZURICH SERVICES CORPORATION
LAW OFFICES OF JOSEPH M. LOVRETOVICH
Joseph M. Lovretovich (SBN 73403)
[e-mail]
Christopher Taylor (SBN 236245)
[e-mail]
Jennifer Lipski (SBN 272443)
[e-mail]
5941 Variel Avenue
Woodland Hills, CA 91367
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
JAMES SNEE

17

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

19
20

JAMES SNEE, an individual,

21

Plaintiff,

22
23
24
25
26

v.
THE ZURICH SERVICES
CORPORATION, an Illinois
Corporation; DOES 1 through 100,
inclusive,

27

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. CV11-02518 GW (JCx)
[Assigned to Judge George H. Wu
Courtroom 10]
STIPULATION AND
PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING DISCOVERY

Complaint Filed: February 18, 2011

28
STIPULATION & PROTECTIVE ORDER RE DISCOVERY
13512744v.1

1

ORDER

2

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and

3

DECREED that all parties to this action shall obey the provisions of the attached

4

Stipulation concerning Confidential Information with the following

5

modifications/clarifications:

6

1.

To the extent the Stipulation concerning Confidential Information

7

calls for resolution of disputes relating to the matters covered therein, i.e.,

8

Paragraph 8 (motion for protective order), Paragraph 9 (motion for further order by

9

recipient of “Confidential” Information), Paragraph 12 (motion for protective

10

order), and Paragraph 16 (objections/challenges to designation), the procedure for

11

obtaining a decision from the Court is set forth in Local Civil Rules 37-1 through

12

37-4. Absent further stipulation or order, the 14-day deadline set forth in

13

Paragraph 12 shall apply to the commencement of the meet and confer process set

14

forth in Local Rule 37-1, not the actual filing of a motion for protective order.

15

2.

Paragraph 14 is modified to reflect that the Court may decide the

16

referenced matter at the final pretrial conference or at any other time as the Court

17

may deem appropriate.

18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated: July 1, 2011

22

/s/
Honorable Jacqueline Chooljian
United States Magistrate Judge

23
24
25
26
27
28
-2STIPULATION & PROTECTIVE ORDER RE DISCOVERY
13512744v.1